Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2F7140F for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 20:34:58 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (relay4-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.196]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9101525C for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 20:34:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mfilter14-d.gandi.net (mfilter14-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.142]) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E21A17208B for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 22:34:56 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter14-d.gandi.net Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([IPv6:::ffff:217.70.183.196]) by mfilter14-d.gandi.net (mfilter14-d.gandi.net [::ffff:10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ADUZTeq-EY35 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 22:34:55 +0200 (CEST) X-Originating-IP: 85.68.245.22 Received: from [192.168.0.18] (abo-22-245-68.guy.modulonet.fr [85.68.245.22]) (Authenticated sender: thomasv@electrum.org) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 21F7F172067 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 22:34:54 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <55BBDBEF.1020501@electrum.org> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 22:34:55 +0200 From: Thomas Voegtlin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org References: <55B0B858.8000106@electrum.org> <55B0E719.4030004@electrum.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposal: extend bip70 with OpenAlias X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 20:34:59 -0000 Le 27/07/2015 23:51, Justin Newton via bitcoin-dev a =E9crit : > Thomas, > I think this is interesting and has some good thoughts behind it. Fo= r > clarity, are you recommending that the "_oa2" portion of the domain nam= e be > "hidden" as a way to make it easier to delegate just wallet names from = a > zone? >=20 I don't think you can completely "hide" it, because you need to know where the _oa2 is in the name, in order to perform requests. In my proposal it was denoted by a @ character in the alias: x@y.z -> x._oa2.y.w