MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: marek@palatinus.cz
In-Reply-To: <CANEZrP3-SV0=PB5rkXbAEKv1CFqfS4hjuBTY3YbU-yNGKde8tg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABsx9T3DM72+8HgNWWZ2HaAgZMQGAPn87L9VVKdkbVkS7sd8Tg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANEZrP3bt40ThBcqWLfzuS5508mpbo4Z5qxh9AJs-FRrk0QJsA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJna-HhS=iNcTcTzEm_GDtjzxbSTDJ0KvEjLvpnR_HngRYjHeA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANEZrP3-SV0=PB5rkXbAEKv1CFqfS4hjuBTY3YbU-yNGKde8tg@mail.gmail.com>
From: slush <slush@centrum.cz>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 16:32:22 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJna-HiSUHSAREzGLxi0nUctmt4OoaAKC7txEruQG_AgwGa_Qw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2be44657e4604e3fd5986
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Version 0.9 goals
Precedence: list

--001a11c2be44657e4604e3fd5986
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net> wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:22 AM, slush <slush@centrum.cz> wrote:
>
>> We're planning to support payment protocol in Trezor as well, if it
>> counts. I think it's a missing piece in absolute security of hardware
>> wallets.
>>
>
> Yup, that's always been the plan :-)
>
> Any idea how much work it is, and would it be a v1 feature of the Trezor
> or added later via firmware update?
>

Our plan is to add support for that into v1 firmware, but it also depends
on readiness of surrounding infrastructure; mainly if there'll be support
for payment protocol in multibit in the time of v1 release (I suppose that
the Multibit will be the first wallet  compatible with Trezor AND
supporting payment protocol).

slush

--001a11c2be44657e4604e3fd5986
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">=
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Mike Hearn <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=
=3D"mailto:mike@plan99.net" target=3D"_blank">mike@plan99.net</a>&gt;</span=
> wrote:<br>

<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"im">On Thu, A=
ug 15, 2013 at 10:22 AM, slush <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:slus=
h@centrum.cz" target=3D"_blank">slush@centrum.cz</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>

</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div class=3D"i=
m"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left=
:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir=3D"ltr">We&#39;re planning to support payment protocol in Trezor a=
s well, if it counts. I think it&#39;s a missing piece in absolute security=
 of hardware wallets.<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div></div><div>Yup, =
that&#39;s always been the plan :-)=A0</div>


<div><br></div><div>Any idea how much work it is, and would it be a v1 feat=
ure of the Trezor or added later via firmware update?</div></div></div></di=
v>
</blockquote></div><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra" style>Our plan is t=
o add support for that into v1 firmware, but it also depends on readiness o=
f surrounding infrastructure; mainly if there&#39;ll be support for payment=
 protocol in multibit in the time of v1 release (I suppose that the Multibi=
t will be the first wallet =A0compatible with Trezor AND supporting payment=
 protocol).</div>

<div class=3D"gmail_extra" style><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra" style=
>slush</div></div>

--001a11c2be44657e4604e3fd5986--