Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.214.171 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.214.171; envelope-from=ibrightly@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-ob0-f171.google.com; 
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <557869F9.8030109@AndySchroder.com>
References: <1943127.DBnVxmfOIh@1337h4x0r>
	<20150610093556.GA11409@amethyst.visucore.com>
	<557869F9.8030109@AndySchroder.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 14:28:55 -0400
Message-ID: <CAAre=yQSkFAHLfJ0h2rQY5vOFExSq2GDiRV32qe=EEVYOxCpqg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ivan Brightly <ibrightly@gmail.com>
To: Andy Schroder <info@andyschroder.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1134b02c35c8fd05182e0cc1
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Is SourceForge still trustworthy enough
 to host this list?
Precedence: list

--001a1134b02c35c8fd05182e0cc1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

I like elegant solutions and while eventually I can see a "pay to
contribute" service, I don't imagine you'll get consensus in short order.

List provider costs are pretty reasonable, so if that's the hurdle to
overcome I'm happy to offer sponsorship.

Ivan Brightly
SolidX Partners

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Andy Schroder <info@andyschroder.com>
wrote:

> Regarding changing the e-mail list provider. Is anyone interested in
> sponsoring it? There are non-free options, but it may be difficult to
> always ensure the fee is being paid to the provider. I think finding an
> agreeable free solution may have been the issue before? I've also
> thought of trying to make a pay per message or byte solution (and this
> cost could be dynamic based upon the number of current mailing list
> subscribers). This could solve the who pays problem (the sender pays),
> as well as motivate people to be more concise and clear with their
> messages, and at the same time limit spam.
>
>
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> Andy Schroder
>
> On 06/10/2015 05:35 AM, Wladimir J. van der Laan wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 10:25:12AM +0200, xor wrote:
> >>
> http://www.howtogeek.com/218764/warning-don%E2%80%99t-download-software-from-sourceforge-if-you-can-help-it/
> > All our downloads (even old ones) have recently been deleted from
> sourceforge, for this reason. They haven't been mentioned in Bitcon Core
> release announcements for a long time.
> >
> > No opinion on the mailing list. Though I think it's less urgent. The
> issue of moving the mailinglist has come up before a few times and people
> can't agree where to move to.
> >
> > Wladimir
> >
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>

--001a1134b02c35c8fd05182e0cc1
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">I like elegant solutions and while eventually I can see a =
&quot;pay to contribute&quot; service, I don&#39;t imagine you&#39;ll get c=
onsensus in short order.<div><br></div><div>List provider costs are pretty =
reasonable, so if that&#39;s the hurdle to overcome I&#39;m happy to offer =
sponsorship.<div><br></div><div>Ivan Brightly</div><div>SolidX Partners</di=
v></div></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On =
Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Andy Schroder <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=
=3D"mailto:info@andyschroder.com" target=3D"_blank">info@andyschroder.com</=
a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0=
 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Regarding changing t=
he e-mail list provider. Is anyone interested in<br>
sponsoring it? There are non-free options, but it may be difficult to<br>
always ensure the fee is being paid to the provider. I think finding an<br>
agreeable free solution may have been the issue before? I&#39;ve also<br>
thought of trying to make a pay per message or byte solution (and this<br>
cost could be dynamic based upon the number of current mailing list<br>
subscribers). This could solve the who pays problem (the sender pays),<br>
as well as motivate people to be more concise and clear with their<br>
messages, and at the same time limit spam.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Any thoughts?<br>
<br>
Andy Schroder<br>
<br>
On 06/10/2015 05:35 AM, Wladimir J. van der Laan wrote:<br>
&gt; On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 10:25:12AM +0200, xor wrote:<br>
&gt;&gt; <a href=3D"http://www.howtogeek.com/218764/warning-don%E2%80%99t-d=
ownload-software-from-sourceforge-if-you-can-help-it/" target=3D"_blank">ht=
tp://www.howtogeek.com/218764/warning-don%E2%80%99t-download-software-from-=
sourceforge-if-you-can-help-it/</a><br>
&gt; All our downloads (even old ones) have recently been deleted from sour=
ceforge, for this reason. They haven&#39;t been mentioned in Bitcon Core re=
lease announcements for a long time.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; No opinion on the mailing list. Though I think it&#39;s less urgent. T=
he issue of moving the mailinglist has come up before a few times and peopl=
e can&#39;t agree where to move to.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Wladimir<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; ----------------------------------------------------------------------=
--------<br>
<br>
<br>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
---<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Bitcoin-development mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net">Bitcoin-develo=
pment@lists.sourceforge.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development=
" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de=
velopment</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>

--001a1134b02c35c8fd05182e0cc1--