Return-Path: <gsanders87@gmail.com> Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 640A1AAE for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 12:18:00 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-ig0-f171.google.com (mail-ig0-f171.google.com [209.85.213.171]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3380F2 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 12:17:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by igcur8 with SMTP id ur8so6470240igc.0 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 05:17:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=QeWMLD1NW8VykAWQDeyw55hTu9H7EKPa3CGpddvOgqA=; b=k5JPfccp2auMZIegKWhA2BC2qa9RyhXbzXsUvURHZUUvIgG81gTgq4VmY4X0htU77V 2ESx7rMiCN0edYClYGxGWcwpVcV/MvlXBurfvF084O04qbq2MUIZZ9T7CtGab9TBwSCa 6JfuzjzVKvdGkCQTluMDngXaLAmAhFdWymY6SuTfsWxIgYVV5GK9Rqvi1HjLPK7GjTPx b569iS35UTHhQ5aLJbAZhrBqPUmULKXjEdzQUDhGdG6reHALHf1s+PPln3Us5HPstEOH kdRVfZ7bP+h+MecpmZUZN3t/u0Xcj0Gz/cT3s5M87zypKjvsVSswE87KxACDoH4AJkkq MI+g== X-Received: by 10.42.238.14 with SMTP id kq14mr8238685icb.23.1435407479470; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 05:17:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.64.76.13 with HTTP; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 05:17:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150627121505.6E857417EC@smtp.hushmail.com> References: <CAPg+sBjOj9eXiDG0F6G54SVKkStF_1HRu2wzGqtFF5X_NAWy4w@mail.gmail.com> <20150627074259.GA25420@amethyst.visucore.com> <CABm2gDr3orTHMN1q8vGmy3NpXWPy5i=zHhGneDGUk=ney3-e+Q@mail.gmail.com> <20150627120935.GD25420@amethyst.visucore.com> <20150627121505.6E857417EC@smtp.hushmail.com> From: Greg Sanders <gsanders87@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 08:17:39 -0400 Message-ID: <CAB3F3Ds=_DG0Z75gmMPWJ=YWga61s7zkL+dkhVkuzTqCg6zf_w@mail.gmail.com> To: NxtChg <nxtchg@hush.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bacbbccec18c905197ed82e X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] The need for larger blocks X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/> List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 12:18:00 -0000 --047d7bacbbccec18c905197ed82e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_know_it_when_I_see_it Can we agree n-1 dev Nacks would be a controversial hard fork? Greg On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 8:15 AM, NxtChg <nxtchg@hush.com> wrote: > > On 6/27/2015 at 3:09 PM, "Wladimir J. van der Laan" <laanwj@gmail.com> > wrote: > > >Not sure though. The only way to find out is to propose them and see. > Maybe wait a bit until things have cooled down... > > And then we are again at the mercy of a single "decider" to judge whether > something is controversial or not? > > It was pointed several times before that with enough loud minority you can > make any change seem controversial. > > > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev > --047d7bacbbccec18c905197ed82e Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr"><a href=3D"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_know_it_when_I_= see_it">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_know_it_when_I_see_it</a>=C2=A0<br>= <div><br></div><div>Can we agree n-1 dev Nacks would be a controversial har= d fork?=C2=A0</div></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br clear=3D"all"><div>= <div class=3D"gmail_signature">Greg</div></div> <br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 8:15 AM, NxtChg <spa= n dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:nxtchg@hush.com" target=3D"_blank">nxtc= hg@hush.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" styl= e=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span c= lass=3D""><br> On 6/27/2015 at 3:09 PM, "Wladimir J. van der Laan" <<a href= =3D"mailto:laanwj@gmail.com">laanwj@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br> <br> >Not sure though. The only way to find out is to propose them and see. M= aybe wait a bit until things have cooled down...<br> <br> </span>And then we are again at the mercy of a single "decider" t= o judge whether something is controversial or not?<br> <br> It was pointed several times before that with enough loud minority you can = make any change seem controversial.<br> <div class=3D"HOEnZb"><div class=3D"h5"><br> <br> _______________________________________________<br> bitcoin-dev mailing list<br> <a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.= linuxfoundation.org</a><br> <a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" = rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail= man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a><br> </div></div></blockquote></div><br></div> --047d7bacbbccec18c905197ed82e--