Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 640A1AAE for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 12:18:00 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-ig0-f171.google.com (mail-ig0-f171.google.com [209.85.213.171]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3380F2 for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 12:17:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by igcur8 with SMTP id ur8so6470240igc.0 for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 05:17:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=QeWMLD1NW8VykAWQDeyw55hTu9H7EKPa3CGpddvOgqA=; b=k5JPfccp2auMZIegKWhA2BC2qa9RyhXbzXsUvURHZUUvIgG81gTgq4VmY4X0htU77V 2ESx7rMiCN0edYClYGxGWcwpVcV/MvlXBurfvF084O04qbq2MUIZZ9T7CtGab9TBwSCa 6JfuzjzVKvdGkCQTluMDngXaLAmAhFdWymY6SuTfsWxIgYVV5GK9Rqvi1HjLPK7GjTPx b569iS35UTHhQ5aLJbAZhrBqPUmULKXjEdzQUDhGdG6reHALHf1s+PPln3Us5HPstEOH kdRVfZ7bP+h+MecpmZUZN3t/u0Xcj0Gz/cT3s5M87zypKjvsVSswE87KxACDoH4AJkkq MI+g== X-Received: by 10.42.238.14 with SMTP id kq14mr8238685icb.23.1435407479470; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 05:17:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.64.76.13 with HTTP; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 05:17:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150627121505.6E857417EC@smtp.hushmail.com> References: <20150627074259.GA25420@amethyst.visucore.com> <20150627120935.GD25420@amethyst.visucore.com> <20150627121505.6E857417EC@smtp.hushmail.com> From: Greg Sanders Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 08:17:39 -0400 Message-ID: To: NxtChg Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bacbbccec18c905197ed82e X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] The need for larger blocks X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 12:18:00 -0000 --047d7bacbbccec18c905197ed82e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_know_it_when_I_see_it Can we agree n-1 dev Nacks would be a controversial hard fork? Greg On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 8:15 AM, NxtChg wrote: > > On 6/27/2015 at 3:09 PM, "Wladimir J. van der Laan" > wrote: > > >Not sure though. The only way to find out is to propose them and see. > Maybe wait a bit until things have cooled down... > > And then we are again at the mercy of a single "decider" to judge whether > something is controversial or not? > > It was pointed several times before that with enough loud minority you can > make any change seem controversial. > > > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev > --047d7bacbbccec18c905197ed82e Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_know_it_when_I_see_it=C2=A0
=

Can we agree n-1 dev Nacks would be a controversial har= d fork?=C2=A0

=
Greg

On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 8:15 AM, NxtChg <nxtc= hg@hush.com> wrote:

On 6/27/2015 at 3:09 PM, "Wladimir J. van der Laan" <laanwj@gmail.com> wrote:

>Not sure though. The only way to find out is to propose them and see. M= aybe wait a bit until things have cooled down...

And then we are again at the mercy of a single "decider" t= o judge whether something is controversial or not?

It was pointed several times before that with enough loud minority you can = make any change seem controversial.


_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
bitcoin-dev@lists.= linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail= man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev

--047d7bacbbccec18c905197ed82e--