Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1YIHp6-0001S9-PW for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 14:17:56 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.3 as permitted sender) client-ip=80.91.229.3; envelope-from=gcbd-bitcoin-development@m.gmane.org; helo=plane.gmane.org; Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) id 1YIHp5-00050s-Ar for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 14:17:56 +0000 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YIHoy-000454-B7 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 15:17:48 +0100 Received: from e177084064.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.177.84.64]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 15:17:48 +0100 Received: from andreas by e177084064.adsl.alicedsl.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 15:17:48 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net From: Andreas Schildbach Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 15:17:41 +0100 Message-ID: References: <54CF74A5.3050304@gk2.sk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: e177084064.adsl.alicedsl.de User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 In-Reply-To: <54CF74A5.3050304@gk2.sk> X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 1.1 DKIM_ADSP_ALL No valid author signature, domain signs all mail -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Headers-End: 1YIHp5-00050s-Ar Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Export format for xpub X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 14:17:56 -0000 On 02/02/2015 01:59 PM, Pavol Rusnak wrote: >> It's h=bip32 for the hierarchy used and > > Do I understand this correctly and h=bip32 hierarchy means that both > > xpub/0/i and xpub/1/j chains are scanned? (So it applies to BIP44 > generated xpubs as well?) Yes, except that BIP32-hierarchy and BIP44 differ in some requirements (e.g. gap limit). >> c=123456 for the creation date of the wallet (in seconds since epoch). > > Uff, I would expect YYYYMMDD there so it's human readable as well. Those strings are not meant to be read by humans. YYYYMMDD is more complicated than necessary, given that Bitcoin deals with seconds since epoch everywhere.