Return-Path: Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A17A3C0001 for ; Sat, 22 May 2021 06:01:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8793E40243 for ; Sat, 22 May 2021 06:01:37 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.099 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: smtp2.osuosl.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OGARJRW5PZf6 for ; Sat, 22 May 2021 06:01:36 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 Received: from mail-ej1-x629.google.com (mail-ej1-x629.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::629]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B625F40121 for ; Sat, 22 May 2021 06:01:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ej1-x629.google.com with SMTP id p24so32269628ejb.1 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 23:01:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=0GYL2QZwQxrGY/0H4uKHAmYljTOSEfjG0g2jYcSLInk=; b=QS53D8gEgE3RAlfWNlVdQsP7ZpJOTIv1qMZkLJGpPI+kPRZy7AFq/DKCvZ4hr/SLD5 jIQEMH7KJ+OL/snIwmYaT3IRWXQ61KPExhqQ+4cGN/LlbxVWWV8N1MTn+cxGr/xCiNsc 9OBIMEjvO9Tagdd/d0a7sPdJwK5iUOPG20qOa1KxwD5USaKMCcaJhY0OYudpn/9KJ5mw v0U5m5DJ6QwVodDZAsKGYl+pgcm1Tj5UpPJgIzxhibRmN6IE4FUjNooUkb3S868JtBFS x5562Cgx90kgUhqLIciJTlJ2dKyPW3cJU0lPtzQI/+4wWh+wxylTsLHR5FVJw+IAY+wK hQig== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=0GYL2QZwQxrGY/0H4uKHAmYljTOSEfjG0g2jYcSLInk=; b=Y5DNj/zPH8how5RL+1G5VeetQsQ+uYexErF9t5Lbbb4XbY6AX8+tx7UMMsBHrXVJoU vsXxKlO8+iIH0WN/KxH7kVDJhf4qam+fkMKnU2ntFcmwJVJMNx9gCwDd8gU4jCZgtmce Qu9PanPKLgHSYuZG3KjOTWYsoyX9QjX5Hlx9bUgsPUQV1dNVU8jzCZeIMAfZyNyAGbaP URG8KPkTQsWKnADD4HFpRnYSu1m7+elyq35pYLvZQQb66cwqVifa60bPOnuf7L2pUG7n AfQ+7KHPmx8B3cumUpapZsCCRua6hgvSei1ZncOXZi3ozpYzNrGhFVRSQAj61OKIbEpo NQYw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532o5GeiqmtRBwR2aiwtHa+ILVjNXwaIUexh9meJby8QwHNEBWiw NzpNaSoDJhb+XvVlec/Psr0KdtGRQBAIucXFAxM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzWuXirImvbkC7Qu0/dtLKHWQ3wwJbfb71l/dl+Piodr6DAyUIax/8uK4DEJV1moXBPsLRFZsN/AH1AIh9ETJI= X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:980c:: with SMTP id ji12mr12993055ejc.152.1621663294773; Fri, 21 May 2021 23:01:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <202105220233.45883.luke@dashjr.org> In-Reply-To: <202105220233.45883.luke@dashjr.org> From: Billy Tetrud Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 20:01:19 -1000 Message-ID: To: Luke Dashjr Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a15cff05c2e4e89b" X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 22 May 2021 12:07:24 +0000 Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion , Christopher Gilliard Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Additional BIPs related to other proposals X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 May 2021 06:01:37 -0000 --000000000000a15cff05c2e4e89b Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Fair enough! On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 4:33 PM Luke Dashjr wrote: > On Friday 21 May 2021 07:56:51 Billy Tetrud via bitcoin-dev wrote: > > These look like relatively well put together documents. However, they > seem > > relatively orthogonal to Bitcoin in that they look like protocols that > > build on top of the bitcoin platform but aren't directly related to > > changing how bitcoin operates at its base layer. Am I miss reading these? > > BIPs are not limited to the base layer. Anything that coordinates between > Bitcoin software at any layer can use BIPs. > --000000000000a15cff05c2e4e89b Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Fair enough!

On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 4:33 PM Luke Dashjr &= lt;luke@dashjr.org> wrote:
On Friday 21 May 2021 = 07:56:51 Billy Tetrud via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> These look like relatively well put together documents. However, they = seem
> relatively orthogonal to Bitcoin in that they look like protocols that=
> build on top of the bitcoin platform but aren't directly related t= o
> changing how bitcoin operates at its base layer. Am I miss reading the= se?

BIPs are not limited to the base layer. Anything that coordinates between <= br> Bitcoin software at any layer can use BIPs.
--000000000000a15cff05c2e4e89b--