Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 02:59:44 +0000
To: LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH <willtech@live.com.au>,
	Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
From: ZmnSCPxj <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com>
Reply-To: ZmnSCPxj <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com>
Message-ID: <uwXr_PVDhAxPgfWwqANXIj4h0dyTW8ID4H9SMr1Aw6hYGfiB722bIcmhsZtyKMkdDUN9TzJUtcFxQ_mTvbjsqDKOIX4UtkBpl_4q_EpS1Cg=@protonmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <PS2P216MB01792E6227170E85F95A2BB49D2A0@PS2P216MB0179.KORP216.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
References: <PS2P216MB01792E6227170E85F95A2BB49D2A0@PS2P216MB0179.KORP216.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Feedback-ID: el4j0RWPRERue64lIQeq9Y2FP-mdB86tFqjmrJyEPR9VAtMovPEo9tvgA0CrTsSHJeeyPXqnoAu6DN-R04uJUg==:Ext:ProtonMail
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] List of proposals for hard fork/soft fork
Precedence: list

Good morning LORD YOUR EXCELLENCY,

May it please you to be informed the below are likely to be included in som=
e kind of upcoming softfork for SegWit v1:

1.  Schnorr signatures.
2.  MuSig.
3.  Taproot.
4.  `SIGHASH_NOINPUT`.
5.  Signature aggregation.  May it please you to be informed, that "Schnorr=
" enables signature aggregation, but is not signature aggregation itself.
6.  MAST.

The above may or may not be an exhaustive list, your excellency.

Of these, I believe only `SIGHASH_NOINPUT` has a BIP, may it please your ex=
cellency to learn that it is BIP 118.
However, I am sorry to inform your excellency, as I understand the `SIGHASH=
_NOINPUT` that will eventually reach Bitcoin Core will not match the curren=
t version of BIP118.
To improve on the possibility of incorrect use of `SIGHASH_NOINPUT`, it is =
proposed that every input that is signed with a `SIGHASH_NOINPUT` signature=
 additionally require a signature without `SIGHASH_NOINPUT`.
For other details, I am sorry to inform your excellency, I have no reliable=
 knowledge.

Regards,
ZmnSCPxj


Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.

=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 Original Me=
ssage =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90
On Sunday, April 14, 2019 10:44 PM, LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH via bitc=
oin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> Is anybody keeping a list of the solid proposals > BIP's to be included i=
n any actual future consensus-driven fork? Perhaps pre-consensus voting of =
what to include in the fork packages?
>
> Surely not every or each proposal ever scouted is on for consideration.
>
> This may actually help to build momentum for useful and valuable implemen=
tations that may otherwise languish.
>
> Regards,
> LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH