Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13418826
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon, 17 Aug 2015 19:16:42 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from outmail148095.authsmtp.com (outmail148095.authsmtp.com
	[62.13.148.95])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EFBA20E
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon, 17 Aug 2015 19:16:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-c235.authsmtp.com (mail-c235.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.235])
	by punt18.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t7HJGcm1024600;
	Mon, 17 Aug 2015 20:16:38 +0100 (BST)
Received: from muck (S0106e03f49079160.ok.shawcable.net [174.4.1.120])
	(authenticated bits=128)
	by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t7HJEilW064757
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
	Mon, 17 Aug 2015 20:16:34 +0100 (BST)
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 12:14:40 -0700
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20150817191440.GA20299@muck>
References: <6EC9DDF352DC4838AE9B088AB372428A25E1F42A@DS04>
	<55D1C81D.4070402@olivere.de>
	<CABm2gDrQTSyJUDWzO5FEy8GD76+coN7tM--8rhC7i0vfmUf0Qw@mail.gmail.com>
	<55D1CAAF.6010400@olivere.de>
	<CAAS2fgT1VxNCaVy=xqU5SCNn_f1k071V26wy5-v2t7qxHW6=3A@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAAS2fgT1VxNCaVy=xqU5SCNn_f1k071V26wy5-v2t7qxHW6=3A@mail.gmail.com>
X-Server-Quench: 7bbe8f8f-4514-11e5-b398-002590a15da7
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
	http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
	aQdMdwUUGUATAgsB AmMbWVReUVt7Wms7 ag1VcwFDY1RPXQV1
	VUBOXVMcUAIQe2lY WnkeVB11cgIIeXxz ZUUsWSIJCUwsfRBg
	RktVEXAHZDJldTIc WUhFdwNWdQpKLx5A PgF4GhFYa3VsNCMk
	FAgyOXU9MCtqYA5U XgoKLFRacXpDMDkm RHjL
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1023:706
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 174.4.1.120/587
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
	anti-virus system.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin XT Fork
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 19:16:42 -0000


--Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 05:18:02PM +0000, Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev w=
rote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Oliver Egginger via bitcoin-dev
> <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > To avoid such discussions.
>=20
> You seem to be assuming that there is specific reason to believe the
> message is unauthentic.  This is not the case.
>=20
> Contrary to other poster's claims, if the message had been PGP signed
> that might, in fact, have arguably been weak evidence that it was
> unauthentic: no message from the system's creator that I (or
> apparently anyone) was aware of was ever signed with that key.

<snip>

> A focus on the content is especially relevant because one of the core
> messages in the content is a request to eschew arguments from
> authority; which is perhaps the greatest challenge here: How can the
> founder of a system speak up to ask people to reject that kind of
> argument without implicitly endorsing that approach through their own
> act?

Something I only recently realised is that Satoshi's apparent policy(1)
of never making any cryptographically secure signatures to link together
his posts - or indeed any communication at all - fits well with the
avoidance of creating a central authority figure. Currently every single
thing Satoshi ever apparently wrote can only be linked together by
trusting third parties - email archives could have been hacked,
bitcointalk might have fake messages, etc. Obviously in practice we have
reasonable assurance that the same person or group was behind most of
the messages we now consider to be "from Satoshi", but ultimately
strictly speaking we can only take each message individually, for the
arguments contained within.

As you've often said, the biggest achievement by Satoshi in the creation
of Bitcoin was to create a system where the identity of the creator is a
mere historical footnote. We can probably go further, and state that
while doing so, Satoshi quite counter-intuitively took steps to avoid
even creating a pseudoanonymous identity.


1) "Does anyone have anything at all signed by Satoshi's PGP key?",
   Peter Todd, Sept 13, 2014, Bitcoin-development mailing list,
   http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2014-September/00=
6606.html

--=20
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
00000000000000000402fe6fb9ad613c93e12bddfc6ec02a2bd92f002050594d

--Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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==
=qwOz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z--