Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A674892 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2015 08:47:11 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-la0-f46.google.com (mail-la0-f46.google.com [209.85.215.46]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3FA163 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2015 08:47:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lalv9 with SMTP id v9so93411304lal.0 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2015 01:47:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=U7C087jlcgQ7jnt9z1xkhqkUgZ8CmxoGxowGN+4Fcw0=; b=vPuA1Ed2EuQiBL1w33mrctgZXr3INRqzc+Oq0W777BXic66nsxfGQkkG0ZamlXxNx1 3gA07TXwhPrfE4SNWqy8/WQw+ncwIyytbj97dQBF4TiLvuu3eDGaGh3rqwErkLPHd40B Q9u9+DSF0ayWzpAphGWWV3KzsAVxGuUJtjCB8NrVgWeHh1NETv7v4bBw+nwiuokTYEmD 2lhPiAtXtsaAbM6lBLrOIVsbTyKZq7sG56cAghX2unV6hocsVdBjVAKzXJy4QITkFYXi NOfR5NXEQZcfKLl6la/RzLmhefOVWs0XXNnJ00Zs7EJR9dHPtxUnfQlC+0E9MNfYW43D qLPA== X-Received: by 10.112.14.8 with SMTP id l8mr22533711lbc.68.1440492427556; Tue, 25 Aug 2015 01:47:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <55D6B653.6050108@riseup.net> In-Reply-To: From: Christian Decker Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 08:46:57 +0000 Message-ID: To: Jeff Garzik Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c36b7472b9a7051e1ec71e X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: Nicolas Dorier , Bitcoin development mailing list Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] RE : Visualizations of Votes X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 08:47:11 -0000 --001a11c36b7472b9a7051e1ec71e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Yes, the two dimensions are orthogonal: BIP 100 support and actual size voting. However there seem to be a few pools which simply vote to support BIP100, without specifying a desired block size [1], hence I started tracking both on the same chart, maybe I'll split them into different charts to clarify. Regards, Chris [1] https://blockchain.info/tx/ba1e5d21a340772d637ee5dc0bde8072ad1a7b499ba241d5bfaae9618749531e On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 4:46 PM Jeff Garzik wrote: > There is a duplicated column. > > BIP 100 voting is /BV\d+/ > > > > On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Christian Decker via bitcoin-dev < > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > >> I hacked together a simple tracking page for the 'block votes', it >> currently includes the 8MB vote and XT, as well as the /BV\d+/ vote for >> generic size: >> http://bitcoinstats.com/network/votes/ >> >> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 7:25 AM odinn via bitcoin-dev < >> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: >> >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> Hello Nicolas, >>> >>> On 08/20/2015 08:49 PM, Nicolas Dorier via bitcoin-dev wrote: >>> >> A visualization I would like to see would include: >>> > >>> >> pie graph(s) of what % are voting for (BIP 100, BIP 101, 8MB, BIP >>> >> sipa >>> > etc) based on what's published in blocks. >>> > >>> > If such a vote existed, I would gladly show the pie on BIPxDevs. >>> > However there is no standard way for miners to vote informally BIP >>> > they support. >>> >>> What about formal votes? Is there a way to visually have them appear >>> in a pie chart as the votes become apparent in blocks? >>> >>> I appreciate good visualizations and am trying to get a (visual) >>> comparison of the votes on these competing proposals. >>> >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing >>> > list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org >>> > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev >>> > >>> >>> - -- >>> http://abis.io ~ >>> "a protocol concept to enable decentralization >>> and expansion of a giving economy, and a new social good" >>> https://keybase.io/odinn >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >>> Version: GnuPG v1 >>> >>> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJV1rZSAAoJEGxwq/inSG8CuNgIAIOIpHavzz6EJ5AOGBg2T859 >>> MV7rsPfk1HBV4K1Yf4HfrlD/1SY0L57SANpRodi1NME3pl27QQCDnuwNLAqOLKtA >>> P/sHXnk9LuSG8Czk0PHOslZ+f1fDbmNm9gtR3QWXGOx0jP2b+WQ8RhkPhqQ++S/i >>> oXmjyrk+8TTu1hxMbuCcG5bqeS0lBm0SyrSbRTPWH+4U1jGYbxQNKkHnuZGByX4B >>> HBWuKvIylQzHCfy0ToUW+Z29Y+78wQNQUOA10eq7qpZCZvfRZUov1KBVXLx8GAKy >>> Y5WGSJYIAt+Rwn9eMxhpD91ZR1vwtqtRZn7M+NtrStPBJt+n4ET9VmPpsMAc/Zc= >>> =AHv3 >>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >>> _______________________________________________ >>> bitcoin-dev mailing list >>> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org >>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> bitcoin-dev mailing list >> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org >> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev >> >> > --001a11c36b7472b9a7051e1ec71e Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Yes, the two dimensions are orthogonal: BIP 100 support an= d actual size voting. However there seem to be a few pools which simply vot= e to support BIP100, without specifying a desired block size [1], hence I s= tarted tracking both on the same chart, maybe I'll split them into diff= erent charts to clarify.

Regards,
Chris
<= div>

[1]=C2=A0https://block= chain.info/tx/ba1e5d21a340772d637ee5dc0bde8072ad1a7b499ba241d5bfaae96187495= 31e

On Mon, Aug 24, = 2015 at 4:46 PM Jeff Garzik <jgarzi= k@gmail.com> wrote:
There is a duplicated column.

BIP 100 voting is= /BV\d+/



On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Christian= Decker via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfounda= tion.org> wrote:
I hacked together a simple tracking page for the 'block votes&= #39;, it currently includes the 8MB vote and XT, as well as the /BV\d+/ vot= e for generic size:

On Fri, Aug 21, = 2015 at 7:25 AM odinn via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation= .org> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP = SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hello Nicolas,

On 08/20/2015 08:49 PM, Nicolas Dorier via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>> A visualization I would like to see would include:
>
>> pie graph(s) of what % are voting for (BIP 100, BIP 101, 8MB, BIP<= br> >> sipa
> etc) based on what's published in blocks.
>
> If such a vote existed, I would gladly show the pie on BIPxDevs.
> However there is no standard way for miners to vote informally BIP
> they support.

What about formal votes? Is there a way to visually have them appear
in a pie chart as the votes become apparent in blocks?

I appreciate good visualizations and am trying to get a (visual)
comparison of the votes on these competing proposals.

>
>
>
> _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing > list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org= /mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>

- --
http://abis= .io ~
"a protocol concept to enable decentralization
and expansion of a giving economy, and a new social good"
h= ttps://keybase.io/odinn
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJV1rZSAAoJEGxwq/inSG8CuNgIAIOIpHavzz6EJ5AOGBg2T859
MV7rsPfk1HBV4K1Yf4HfrlD/1SY0L57SANpRodi1NME3pl27QQCDnuwNLAqOLKtA
P/sHXnk9LuSG8Czk0PHOslZ+f1fDbmNm9gtR3QWXGOx0jP2b+WQ8RhkPhqQ++S/i
oXmjyrk+8TTu1hxMbuCcG5bqeS0lBm0SyrSbRTPWH+4U1jGYbxQNKkHnuZGByX4B
HBWuKvIylQzHCfy0ToUW+Z29Y+78wQNQUOA10eq7qpZCZvfRZUov1KBVXLx8GAKy
Y5WGSJYIAt+Rwn9eMxhpD91ZR1vwtqtRZn7M+NtrStPBJt+n4ET9VmPpsMAc/Zc=3D
=3DAHv3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
= bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail= man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev

_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
= bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail= man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev


--001a11c36b7472b9a7051e1ec71e--