Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1WcWB7-00077w-KI for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 08:35:45 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from qmta09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.96]) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1WcWB4-00019k-CU for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 08:35:45 +0000 Received: from omta11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.36]) by qmta09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id swb21n0010mv7h059wbdus; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 08:35:37 +0000 Received: from crushinator.localnet ([IPv6:2601:6:4800:47f:219:d1ff:fe75:dc2f]) by omta11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id swbc1n00H4VnV2P3XwbcB7; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 08:35:37 +0000 From: Matt Whitlock To: jan.moller@gmail.com Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 04:35:36 -0400 Message-ID: <2025496.b5Y3n7qx8B@crushinator> User-Agent: KMail/4.13 (Linux/3.12.13-gentoo; KDE/4.13.0; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1927948.OEZHQcsQ9n@crushinator> References: <1927948.OEZHQcsQ9n@crushinator> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [76.96.62.96 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1WcWB4-00019k-CU Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Presenting a BIP for Shamir's Secret Sharing of Bitcoin private keys X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 08:35:45 -0000 On Tuesday, 22 April 2014, at 4:11 am, Matt Whitlock wrote: > On Tuesday, 22 April 2014, at 10:06 am, Jan M=F8ller wrote: > > - I think it is very useful to define different prefixes for testn= et > > keys/seeds. As a developer I use the testnet every day, and many of= our > > users use it for trying out new functionality. Mixing up keys meant= for > > testnet and mainnet is bad. >=20 > A fair point. I'll add some prefixes for testnet. Testnet encodings are added: https://github.com/whitslack/btctool/blob/= bip/bip-xxxx.mediawiki