Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Z17b2-0005Zv-T8 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 06 Jun 2015 06:28:44 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.192.175 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.192.175; envelope-from=gappleto97@gmail.com; helo=mail-pd0-f175.google.com; Received: from mail-pd0-f175.google.com ([209.85.192.175]) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1Z17b1-0000R5-2g for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 06 Jun 2015 06:28:44 +0000 Received: by pdjn11 with SMTP id n11so28816615pdj.0 for ; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 23:28:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.68.230 with SMTP id z6mr11715491pbt.102.1433572115356; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 23:28:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.194.168 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Jun 2015 23:28:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.194.168 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Jun 2015 23:28:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <556CDB09.8050906@henricson.se> Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2015 02:28:35 -0400 Message-ID: From: gabe appleton To: Pindar Wong Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11380e4ab223b20517d38487 X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (gappleto97[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.2 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in digit (gappleto97[at]gmail.com) 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1Z17b1-0000R5-2g Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Meta suggestions for this block size debate X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2015 06:28:44 -0000 --001a11380e4ab223b20517d38487 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Yeah. We made a git repo instead, so we don't have to bother with the exclusive-by-default wiki policies. It's linked in this email chain. I'll be getting home tomorrow, so I should be able to start back up on this. A few days from now we should throw this on /r/Bitcoin so we can get some more public comment on it. They already gave me a few leads to chase. On Jun 5, 2015 11:34 PM, "Pindar Wong" wrote: > Gabe, > > Did you ever get an answer to this? > > I"ll have some time tomorrow to be able to help with some work on this and > will need to do it myself anyways since I'm not sure I understand the > nuances, where bitcoin XT fits into the scheme of things (or not) etc. > > I would have thought that there would be a testnet4 by now using 8mb > blocks... but hey that's just me. > > p. > > > > > On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 11:52 AM, gabe appleton > wrote: > >> I don't have permission to create a page. If someone else does, I'll >> happily get a framework started. >> >> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 11:32 PM, Ethan Heilman wrote: >> >>> I second this, I don't have time to read the large number of emails >>> generated every day from the block size debate. A summary of the various >>> positions and arguments would be extremely helpful. >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 11:02 PM, gabe appleton >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Also, can we try to get a wiki page for the debate? That way we could >>>> condense the information as much as possible. I'll be willing to assist if >>>> the page gets approval. >>>> On Jun 1, 2015 6:41 PM, "Mats Henricson" wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi! >>>>> >>>>> My fingers have been itching many times now, this debate >>>>> drives me nuts. >>>>> >>>>> I just wish all posters could follow two simple principles: >>>>> >>>>> 1. Read up. Yes. All of what has been written. Yes, it will >>>>> take many hours. But if you're rehashing what other >>>>> smarter people have said over and over before, you're >>>>> wasting hundreds of peoples time. Please don't. >>>>> >>>>> 2. Be helpful. Suggest alternatives. Just cristizising is >>>>> just destructive. If you want no change, then say so. >>>>> >>>>> Mats >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Bitcoin-development mailing list >>>>> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Bitcoin-development mailing list >>>> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Bitcoin-development mailing list >> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development >> >> > --001a11380e4ab223b20517d38487 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Yeah. We made a git repo instead, so we don't have to bo= ther with the exclusive-by-default wiki policies. It's linked in this e= mail chain.

I'll be getting home tomorrow, so I should be able to st= art back up on this. A few days from now we should throw this on /r/Bitcoin= so we can get some more public comment on it. They already gave me a few l= eads to chase.

On Jun 5, 2015 11:34 PM, "Pindar Wong"= <pindar.wong@gmail.com>= wrote:
Gabe,

Did you ever get an answer to this?
I"ll have some time tomorrow to be able to help with some work on th= is and will need to do it myself anyways since I'm not sure I understan= d the nuances, where bitcoin XT fits into the scheme of things (or not) etc= .

I would have thought that there would be a testnet4 by = now using 8mb blocks... but hey that's just me.

p.



On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 11:52 AM, gabe appleton &l= t;gappleto97@gmai= l.com> wrote:
I don't have permission to create a page. If someone else does, I&#= 39;ll happily get a framework started.

On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 11:32 PM, Ethan= Heilman <eth3rs@gmail.com> wrote:
I second this, I don't have time to read the= large number of emails generated every day from the block size debate. A s= ummary of the various positions and arguments would be extremely helpful.= =C2=A0

On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 11:02 PM, gabe appleton <<= a href=3D"mailto:gappleto97@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">gappleto97@gmail.c= om> wrote:

A= lso, can we try to get a wiki page for the debate? That way we could conden= se the information as much as possible. I'll be willing to assist if th= e page gets approval.

On Jun 1, 2015 6:41 PM, "Mats Henricson&quo= t; <mats@henricso= n.se> wrote:
= Hi!

My fingers have been itching many times now, this debate
drives me nuts.

I just wish all posters could follow two simple principles:

1. Read up. Yes. All of what has been written. Yes, it will
=C2=A0 =C2=A0take many hours. But if you're rehashing what other
=C2=A0 =C2=A0smarter people have said over and over before, you're
=C2=A0 =C2=A0wasting hundreds of peoples time. Please don't.

2. Be helpful. Suggest alternatives. Just cristizising is
=C2=A0 =C2=A0just destructive. If you want no change, then say so.

Mats

---------------------------------------------------------------------------= ---
_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de= velopment

-----------------------------------------------------------= -------------------

_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de= velopment




-----------------------------------------------------------= -------------------

_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de= velopment


--001a11380e4ab223b20517d38487--