Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TGqIf-0006vS-6J for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 12:01:09 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from zinan.dashjr.org ([173.242.112.54]) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1TGqIZ-0008V9-OJ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 12:01:09 +0000 Received: from ishibashi.localnet (unknown [173.170.188.216]) (Authenticated sender: luke-jr) by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C938227A2976; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 12:00:57 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke-Jr" To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 12:00:49 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.4.10-gentoo-nestfix; KDE/4.8.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <5061F8CC.9070906@mistfpga.net> <5062E9D9.2080205@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5062E9D9.2080205@gmail.com> X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: E463 A93F 5F31 17EE DE6C 7316 BD02 9424 21F4 889F X-PGP-Key-ID: BD02942421F4889F X-PGP-Keyserver: hkp://pgp.mit.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201209261200.51332.luke@dashjr.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -0.8 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-Headers-End: 1TGqIZ-0008V9-OJ Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin Testing Project X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 12:01:09 -0000 On Wednesday, September 26, 2012 11:41:13 AM Daniel F wrote: > on 09/26/2012 01:49 AM Wladimir said the following: > > I'm willing to write this. But I know these kinds of proposals always > > end in a big discussion about what should be and what should not be on > > bitcoin.org, however we should be a bit pragmatic here. > > May I suggest a page bitcoin.org/developers, that links to a wiki page > of developer resources? > That way there's an easy link from the main site, but the content is > readily editable and expandable. The front page already has wiki links. Adding a direct link to a developer resources page there would probably make sense.