Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1WaMLq-0001pD-Gg for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 09:41:54 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.213.176 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.213.176; envelope-from=laanwj@gmail.com; helo=mail-ig0-f176.google.com; Received: from mail-ig0-f176.google.com ([209.85.213.176]) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1WaMLp-0003sa-QI for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 09:41:54 +0000 Received: by mail-ig0-f176.google.com with SMTP id uy17so816350igb.3 for ; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 02:41:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.42.86.196 with SMTP id v4mr1236246icl.62.1397641308508; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 02:41:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.70.131 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 02:41:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 11:41:48 +0200 Message-ID: From: Wladimir To: Melvin Carvalho Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf30223a23b7975904f725b9d8 X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (laanwj[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1WaMLp-0003sa-QI Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Warning message when running wallet in Windows XP (or drop support?) X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 09:41:54 -0000 --20cf30223a23b7975904f725b9d8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Melvin Carvalho wrote: > XP with a trezor would work fine tho? > Probably - but that's a very rare edge case. People that are security conscious enough to buy a Trezor will not run XP. Also I don't dare to say that there is not some way to sociaal-engineer the user with malware on a compromised OS even with a trezor. Maybe: for 0.9.2 add a warning message and push people to upgrade (either to Win8.1 or something else), then in the next major release 0.10.0 drop XP support completely. Wladimir --20cf30223a23b7975904f725b9d8 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@g= mail.com> wrote:
XP with a trezor would w= ork fine tho?

Probably - but that'= ;s a very rare edge case. People that are security conscious enough to buy = a Trezor will not run XP. Also I don't dare to say that there is not so= me way to sociaal-engineer the user with malware on a compromised OS even w= ith a trezor.

Maybe: for 0.9.2 add a warning message= and push people to upgrade (either to Win8.1 or something else), then in t= he next major release 0.10.0 drop XP support completely.

Wladimir

--20cf30223a23b7975904f725b9d8--