Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA207AF3 for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 10:48:41 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from outmail149095.authsmtp.com (outmail149095.authsmtp.com [62.13.149.95]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8732C184 for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 10:48:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-c245.authsmtp.com (mail-c245.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.245]) by punt22.authsmtp.com. (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id vASAmcEG090881; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 10:48:38 GMT (envelope-from pete@petertodd.org) Received: from petertodd.org (ec2-52-5-185-120.compute-1.amazonaws.com [52.5.185.120]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.authsmtp.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id vASAmaGL007246 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 28 Nov 2017 10:48:37 GMT (envelope-from pete@petertodd.org) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by petertodd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B786840101; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 10:48:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4465D20350; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 05:48:28 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 05:48:28 -0500 From: Peter Todd To: Gregory Maxwell , Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Message-ID: <20171128104828.GA6115@fedora-23-dvm> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jRHKVT23PllUwdXP" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Server-Quench: b09ecd20-d429-11e7-9f3b-9cb654bb2504 X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at: http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR aQdMdAoUFloCAgsB AmEbWlReVFV7Wms7 bghPaBtcak9QXgdq T0pMXVMcUnQLcEFQ cWIeUh5wcwMIfnd5 ZggwXnkODxB4dVsp RkxdCGwHMGB9YTYc Al1RJFFSdQcYLB1A alQxNiYHcQ5VPz4z GA41ejw8IwAXAgVt G1xcZRdaZ2EnMwka aiw9Og8MKmkkYgQP AjBuMVMGAkcaPw04 MEc6HTBQPg8OBwtS FktMBC5FNjH/ X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1039:706 X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255) X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 52.5.185.120/25 X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own anti-virus system. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP159 - NODE_NETWORK_LIMITED service bits, extendability X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 10:48:41 -0000 --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 06:45:33PM +0000, Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev w= rote: > With the way pruning works today my expirence is that virtually no one > sets any parameter other than the minimum, though even with that set a > few more blocks can be available. FWIW, I run all my pruned nodes with the prune parameter set to about a mon= th worth of blocks (a few GB). And come to think of it, I should bump that up = even higher now that segwit has increased the blocksize. --=20 https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEFcyURjhyM68BBPYTJIFAPaXwkfsFAlodPvoACgkQJIFAPaXw kfvZXwgApSH069wkDk4tInPYj65gPRYFoS5F/AOpRR70rOXv9+5RMtjE57bStQtb mgPQHluKzHmG/WIcmvhkd14pLSqJZRwe2Av953nrY6ezqjXseaD0KWZfF/louMv1 suIpDDDMs/vYWXmKQgkAs0DEERlL17mjiGiiTXP7SniZGejR2WVCp06x8BbpHUlL uBkiNh9VAG8QW/xJZ+HOaS4wwskDYv3ngK7asf9a/gE9+fX04v43buZlb8oifC/W QwcjDfTA18jeARRXL9lnwpS84HDleqvlcMYo6qYR3TTHXBWVHAK9lokzUnqI3Y4C ZsgOe61IDnt9XdKU5ChRQAcSkSTcCQ== =d6l/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP--