Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <bendavenport@gmail.com>) id 1WOAiw-0001j2-Uc for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 18:51:22 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.219.54 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.219.54; envelope-from=bendavenport@gmail.com; helo=mail-oa0-f54.google.com; Received: from mail-oa0-f54.google.com ([209.85.219.54]) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1WOAit-0004Z5-LL for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 18:51:22 +0000 Received: by mail-oa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id n16so1503354oag.41 for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 11:51:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.132.142 with SMTP id ou14mr2770088oeb.48.1394736674323; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 11:51:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.35.102 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 11:51:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <CANEZrP1CtsXV7m=qpJ1px1cQw9C7AkDYXe7Op8gQqg2+VK3mYA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAKaEYhK4oXH3hB7uS3=AEkA6r0VB5OYyTua+LOP18rq+rYajHg@mail.gmail.com> <52852C2D.9020103@gmail.com> <52853D8A.6010501@monetize.io> <CAJHLa0M6CkoDbD6FFixf9-mmhug7DvehSWCJ+EHWVxUDuwNiBg@mail.gmail.com> <EE02A310-8604-4811-B2D0-FC32C72C20F3@grabhive.com> <CAJHLa0OMcTCgGESi-F4jT2NA3FyCeMYbD_52j47t3keEYBfK8g@mail.gmail.com> <CA+s+GJBSGPBQWWYR1NYSc2E4Y1BWAn8zf7xsu4wQ1O8cA8OWbw@mail.gmail.com> <CAJHLa0NEEppHg_Lmi_Oxnz_gPSHZPfQpeg+-8MrvFYDmdM83-g@mail.gmail.com> <20140313160850.GW3180@nl.grid.coop> <CAC1+kJOQfhFaMs34STGOeqbmHdv6bVis7o57BcF3=XYudNw_Lg@mail.gmail.com> <CANEZrP1CtsXV7m=qpJ1px1cQw9C7AkDYXe7Op8gQqg2+VK3mYA@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 11:51:14 -0700 Message-ID: <CALimQCXCjkBc7QbsLgM-q7pth4nhZ8e8m60epgkBhcJUf=kbZg@mail.gmail.com> From: Ben Davenport <bendavenport@gmail.com> To: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b4724a207432b04f48170c5 X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (bendavenport[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1WOAit-0004Z5-LL Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>, Wendell <w@grabhive.com> Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] moving the default display to mbtc X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development> List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 18:51:23 -0000 --047d7b4724a207432b04f48170c5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Another vote in support of uBTC. I made my position clear in May of last year. Since then, Dogecoin has essentially PROVEN the psychological value of a low-valued large-balance currency. (From: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=220322.msg2334059#msg2334059) "The whole unit change seems so disruptive and difficult to coordinate now -- do we really want to have to deal with another one later when there are way more people to try to coordinate? I really think we should look to the endgame and figure out where we want to be. "I'd propose moving to uB (micro-bitcoin = 1e-6) as the standard unit now and forever. For now, it can be referred to as uB or uBTC, but over time, once it's ubiquitous, it should just be called a bitcoin. Because the smallest unit is the satoshi (1e-8), this means uB-denominated prices would get 2 decimal places maximum, which is the most that any consumer wants to deal with anyway. "At the same time, I'd propose inverting the exchange rate, so instead of quoting uB/USD = .00013, it would be quoted as USD/uB = 7692. This is exactly the same way Yen are quoted relative to USD (USDJPY = 100.66), and is also the same way other private virtual currencies such as WoW gold are quoted." On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net> wrote: > You would only need to change it if there was a sub-satoshi hardfork, >> which doesn't seem necessary anytime soon. >> > > + > > We shouldn't make any assumptions about the future price of bitcoin to >> make the decision. >> > > Hmmm ;) Didn't you just make an assumption about the future price? > > >> This sounds very US-centric to me. Aren't you thinking in usd? >> > > The currencies I'm familiar with are CHF, USD, EUR and GBP, which all have > roughly similar values. I guess such currencies make up the bulk of the > Bitcoin userbase at the moment. > > >> "People seem to like mBTC" is just an ad populum fallacy: millions of >> flies can actually be wrong. Also you haven't showed them micros, >> maybe they like it too. > > > Saying "it's already popular and would take work to change" is not really > a fallacy now, is it? > > But anyway, this is getting silly. You don't have to convince me. Go visit > all the services I listed above, plus all the ones I didn't find in my five > minutes of searching, and convince them they're wrong like the flies and > switching is the best use of their time :o > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book > "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their > applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field, > this first edition is now available. Download your free book today! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech > _______________________________________________ > Bitcoin-development mailing list > Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development > > --047d7b4724a207432b04f48170c5 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr">Another vote in support of uBTC. I made my position clear = in May of last year. Since then, Dogecoin has essentially PROVEN the psycho= logical value of a low-valued large-balance currency.<div><br></div><div>(F= rom: <a href=3D"https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3D220322.msg2334059= #msg2334059">https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3D220322.msg2334059#ms= g2334059</a>)</div> <div><br></div><div>"The whole unit change seems so disruptive and dif= ficult to coordinate now -- do we really want to have to deal with another = one later when there are way more people to try to coordinate? I really thi= nk we should look to the endgame and figure out where we want to be.<div> <br></div><div>"I'd propose moving to uB (micro-bitcoin =3D 1e-6) = as the standard unit now and forever. For now, it can be referred to as uB = or uBTC, but over time, once it's ubiquitous, it should just be called = a bitcoin. Because the smallest unit is the satoshi (1e-8), this means uB-d= enominated prices would get 2 decimal places maximum, which is the most tha= t any consumer wants to deal with anyway.</div> <div><br></div><div>"At the same time, I'd propose inverting the e= xchange rate, so instead of quoting uB/USD =3D .00013, it would be quoted a= s USD/uB =3D 7692. This is exactly the same way Yen are quoted relative to = USD (USDJPY =3D 100.66), and is also the same way other private virtual cur= rencies such as WoW gold are quoted."</div> <div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div></div><div class=3D"gmai= l_extra"><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 11:29 A= M, Mike Hearn <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:mike@plan99.net" targ= et=3D"_blank">mike@plan99.net</a>></span> wrote:<br> <blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p= x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra">= <div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div class=3D""><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote= " style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> <div>You would only need to change it if there was a sub-satoshi hardfork, = which doesn't seem necessary anytime soon.</div> </blockquote><div><br></div></div><div class=3D""><div>+</div><div><br></di= v><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:= 1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> <div>We shouldn't make any assumptions about the future price of bitcoi= n to make the decision.</div></blockquote><div><br></div></div><div>Hmmm ;)= Didn't you just make an assumption about the future price?</div><div c= lass=3D""> <div>=A0</div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;= border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div>This sounds very US-centr= ic to me. Aren't you thinking in usd?<br></div></blockquote><div> <br></div></div><div>The currencies I'm familiar with are CHF, USD, EUR= and GBP, which all have roughly similar values. I guess such currencies ma= ke up the bulk of the Bitcoin userbase at the moment.</div><div class=3D""> <div>=A0</div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;= border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> "People seem to like mBTC" is just an ad populum fallacy: million= s of<br> flies can actually be wrong. Also you haven't showed them micros,<br> maybe they like it too.</blockquote><div><br></div></div><div>Saying "= it's already popular and would take work to change" is not really = a fallacy now, is it?</div><div><br></div><div>But anyway, this is getting = silly. You don't have to convince me. Go visit all the services I liste= d above, plus all the ones I didn't find in my five minutes of searchin= g, and convince them they're wrong like the flies and switching is the = best use of their time :o=A0</div> </div></div></div> <br>-----------------------------------------------------------------------= -------<br> Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book<br> "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases = and their<br> applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field,<br> this first edition is now available. Download your free book today!<br> <a href=3D"http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech" target=3D"_blank">http://p.sf= .net/sfu/13534_NeoTech</a><br>_____________________________________________= __<br> Bitcoin-development mailing list<br> <a href=3D"mailto:Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net">Bitcoin-develo= pment@lists.sourceforge.net</a><br> <a href=3D"https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development= " target=3D"_blank">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de= velopment</a><br> <br></blockquote></div><br></div> --047d7b4724a207432b04f48170c5--