Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1YVuCY-0003UO-AN for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 03:54:26 +0000 Received: from nm48-vm7.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com ([216.109.115.174]) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1YVuCX-0000AY-0q for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 03:54:26 +0000 Received: from [98.139.214.32] by nm48.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Mar 2015 03:54:19 -0000 Received: from [98.139.212.211] by tm15.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Mar 2015 03:54:19 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1020.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Mar 2015 03:54:19 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 624020.75328.bm@omp1020.mail.bf1.yahoo.com X-YMail-OSG: JkqI56MVM1lvgOZCHSesFj8Cxdf_.ZpSXtOl0dT7OXa3mJ7QIfJUNd0y.dm0Jwf mllPE.6vPzwJyDpZx9yi38J0TOa659VDsiJRCC1DDlNGWMoa4mQKiigvyXFrq_gLNm3uNLqbC2SX XyfofEsnILzo.b0aqDznNo8PryZepC6yeSEd8YpwRJMG0sROJZ8T_bKT52t0xWgWbh3Yvi52Kcuj wdCTesZ7g39I2ggeMJ5udGZ9NHfy6CnnQhzzAjm389DrM6GqqeqcDRpdHKx_UIMD8yJzTBe6a8Hd EMJ0GcIDk4UL8igF0AzIB6wfeNGuUeTypB7McXSfu.uBFUhZFBrtgwcULrsd_j4YIkQXddmCinUM QFVwXREAZRZYGaBgjC4C1RrWVYvMgFIIqroLym8yoD8r5_9H4zAagQwJSEaceApGJ_zVc.zujcko 4_D8Wn9Y1zdZfmNC0.Eme6lDJdklTX4UmKaXj.VfiHByVLoBzuzv2zCVC6DoVNrEWR7NHlesG26_ 90vSPcNSaE3QeBKojOds3HUyklY.4era31wixBcuMx4xbsvrfP4T7E03NTIxLUu9rkRZnyLoqXTb Sbzc2aW6uirvB75O09X7YjVazFnHmuDvq Received: by 66.196.80.121; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 03:54:19 +0000 Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 03:54:18 +0000 (UTC) From: Thy Shizzle To: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net" Message-ID: <1471270766.4418408.1426132458859.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_4418407_1371004816.1426132458856" X-Spam-Score: 1.2 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (harro84[at]yahoo.com.au) -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [216.109.115.174 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.2 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in digit (harro84[at]yahoo.com.au) 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.0 AWL AWL: Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address X-Headers-End: 1YVuCX-0000AY-0q Subject: [Bitcoin-development] Testnet3 X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: Thy Shizzle List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 03:54:26 -0000 ------=_Part_4418407_1371004816.1426132458856 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, so I have my .NET node communicating on the P2P network just fine, so = I figured as I'll now start looking at making and validating transactions e= tc I should probably migrate to test net. Now I see that we are up to the t= hird generation testnet testnet3, and I am sending my messages now using pa= cket magic 0x0b110907 and I'm using Wireshark and I can confirm that my mes= sages are going out with that packet magic. Now what is interesting is that when I try connect to a test node obtained = from DNS seed testnet-seed.bitcoin.petertodd.org, I send it a version messa= ge with the testnet3 packet magic, yet I get no verack or version in respon= se???? In fact, the only thing I get back is a ping and then the connection= is severed by the=C2=A0remote node. What is going on? Also, it works fine with the=C2=A0mainnet packet magic va= lue of 0x0f9beb4d9 and I am debuging my code and ensuring it is looking for= the testnet3 packet magic, but I am not getting a response from the node? ------=_Part_4418407_1371004816.1426132458856 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi, so I have my .NET node communicating on the = P2P network just fine, so I figured as I'll now start looking at making and= validating transactions etc I should probably migrate to test net. Now I s= ee that we are up to the third generation testnet testnet3, and I am sendin= g my messages now using packet magic 0x0b110907 and I'm using Wireshark and= I can confirm that my messages are going out with that packet magic.
=

Now what is interesting i= s that when I try connect to a test node obtained from DNS seed testnet-see= d.bitcoin.petertodd.org, I send it a version message with the testnet3 pack= et magic, yet I get no verack or version in response???? In fact, the only = thing I get back is a ping and then the connection is severed by the r= emote node.
<= br>
What is g= oing on? Also, it works fine with the mainnet packet magic value of 0x= 0f9beb4d9 and I am debuging my code and ensuring it is looking for the test= net3 packet magic, but I am not getting a response from the node?





------=_Part_4418407_1371004816.1426132458856--