Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8556131B for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 10:33:08 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com (mail-wi0-f181.google.com [209.85.212.181]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79EE61A4 for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 10:33:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wicfv10 with SMTP id fv10so65756614wic.0 for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 03:33:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=knyJA5UTuEWVDxBsDQ44smbBxMJCVGD7zhcLGJoQM6k=; b=HbH3HoywIZ+xIUEQp9gG5zoaeI/zLt087hkAKlRI9lqFsI5N478Xz+u/eTU7BZUUNR M6HTNh0ERzKmdAWd4U4q5FUkB2rv9wApX2659ieM52ibUNefsXv4UR9ILec01y2rtKdy wMTZ8imdiiTfXwg+bbmesa7hRdLA0nznBoNxytGvyC130JQVkFAfmC7OLru4fMd5KfQo DPye8tfBQX8mqIRMl1bbWQyGY9IoeHRwJJwXqcq62Kx0sN8HP5CDF0WwyBR/PDxx0d9C Runukl+rQn3dMdGnpstxcA4mCWU1CfCbT0CVMVlqtH5ZBFKuV+WGjA9hhy1mOpDwGY8g q8bg== X-Received: by 10.194.88.102 with SMTP id bf6mr24874100wjb.99.1441017187164; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 03:33:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from amethyst.visucore.com (dhcp-089-098-228-253.chello.nl. [89.98.228.253]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s9sm17679792wjy.16.2015.08.31.03.33.05 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=AES128-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 31 Aug 2015 03:33:06 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 12:33:21 +0200 From: "Wladimir J. van der Laan" To: sisadm101@clovermail.net Message-ID: <20150831103319.GA27605@amethyst.visucore.com> References: <20150821130333.Horde.9zPFmy3VMqAO5FGReDHaRg1@www.vfemail.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150821130333.Horde.9zPFmy3VMqAO5FGReDHaRg1@www.vfemail.net> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Censorship X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 10:33:09 -0000 On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 01:03:33PM -0500, sisadm101--- via bitcoin-dev wrote: > is from a one sided point of view? There doesn't seem to be a solution at > this time, but I find it dissapointing that many (in this very email list) Please, this has drifted so far from the goal of this list: bitcoin development, and technical and academic debate about that. Meta-discussion of communities has no place here. I'd say: in the spirit of permissionlessness, everyone can create a community or list about bitcoin. If you don't agree with the admin, create your own. That's more constructive use of everyone's time and energy than trying to pressure people to change their behavior on their own home turf. Wladimir