References: <CADr=VrRT2tdN0jjkZ7HjjeyqonrHG=j+uh8m1L2nhew7c1gnng@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADJgMztScEsDEy277Jksy2RckbpzeRw6RbQzyVrdkjJSS=hHPA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADr=VrQ42Gqv7fUFVpaburw0=08SNXb0TUCBWd3arREbpdfCkA@mail.gmail.com>
	<55E61A64.2030609@bitcoins.info>
	<CADr=VrQeQ2=Htcen-oJrJWWhf5aQ8-cjYK28ic1UWNFWMf2nDQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<55E629DF.3030407@bitcoins.info>
	<CADr=VrTfn+02nAOY8+i11haoWis4UHQ8WZB=qKrkmLE8YEkKMQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Milly Bitcoin <milly@bitcoins.info>
To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Message-ID: <55E63788.3070409@bitcoins.info>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 19:40:56 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
	Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CADr=VrTfn+02nAOY8+i11haoWis4UHQ8WZB=qKrkmLE8YEkKMQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Open Block Chain Licence, BIP[xxxx] Draft
Precedence: list

> I would just like to labour the point that users pay to use the network,
> but they have no defined rights, anywhere.

That is an interesting point.  That is a feature of Bitcoin, not a bug. 
  If the user did have rights to sue someone then the system would not 
be decentralized.  User rights = someone else has a liability for 
violating those rights.

As it is now a user would have the right to sue all the miners, node 
operators, and developers collectively.  Of course that is not realistic 
which is the way a decentralized system should be.  If you want to try 
to define specific entities that have liability then they must be in 
control or otherwise they would not be liable.

Russ