Return-Path: Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0007C000B for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 02:08:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE4B540891 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 02:08:05 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.099 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=tutanota.de Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cTUPzcGKMBjk for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 02:08:05 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 Received: from w1.tutanota.de (w1.tutanota.de [81.3.6.162]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EED67408E3 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 02:08:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from w3.tutanota.de (unknown [192.168.1.164]) by w1.tutanota.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 589F4FBF85F; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 02:08:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1645150082; s=s1; d=tutanota.de; h=From:From:To:To:Subject:Subject:Content-Description:Content-ID:Content-Type:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Cc:Date:Date:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Message-ID:Reply-To:References:Sender; bh=P2p6hYdMaPlRPX0J1Gw7RiOdW6itXwCkezRmZMEpjJk=; b=Z9mvrv9c4ik6M48HfPy1j53U1uU2ud/innxuog8THIMC1qardniJAcKWslQIjEOX u96vV1WxtMsgkWSYNp7jSWAYOdTi/Yu90s0dCrNr0H10fLbojO03gepnsOrZZEe7Zb6 A8IThr7b69fMkwAWxMgdnGMfMOBNY1CR+CvDyNhvXNsNm0sYif1Nv/Hr5rfS6AeT4Dr +RNzmq9zM+4yJqrwK6RHeTWVG1N8gO0Pd8aGrKfMpjOoj1hwIzA0HvaCm+/BDlQhtN6 aoTXURFySUchPrc2vUoOM0h4wDX3IUSfgsVQEjmuBDK2wgiGOxuv5eJ6nKEfk1Asu+4 mFt8QJ02VQ== Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2022 03:08:02 +0100 (CET) From: Prayank To: James Obeirne Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_109811_2051551271.1645150082351" X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 18 Feb 2022 08:45:43 +0000 Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Thoughts on fee bumping X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2022 02:08:06 -0000 ------=_Part_109811_2051551271.1645150082351 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > If anyone has any indication that there are miners running forks of bitco= ind that change this behavior, I'd be curious to know it. It is possible because some mining pools use bitcoind with custom patches.= =C2=A0 Example: https://twitter.com/0xB10C/status/1461392912600776707 (f2pool) --=20 Prayank A3B1 E430 2298 178F ------=_Part_109811_2051551271.1645150082351 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> If anyone has any indication that there are miners running forks of bitcoind that change this behavior, I'd be curious to know it.

It is possible because some mining pools use bitcoind with custom patches.

Example: https://twitter.com/0xB10C/status/1461392912600776707 (f2pool)

Prayank

A3B1 E430 2298 178F

------=_Part_109811_2051551271.1645150082351--