Return-Path: <luke@dashjr.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B0F383D
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:36:31 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from zinan.dashjr.org (unknown [192.3.11.21])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD27CE2
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:36:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ishibashi.localnet (adsl-98-70-231-167.gnv.bellsouth.net
	[98.70.231.167]) (Authenticated sender: luke-jr)
	by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E571138A17C7;
	Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:36:06 +0000 (UTC)
X-Hashcash: 1:25:160810:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org::eMSIDzW2A8sV5nDr:aLkf=
X-Hashcash: 1:25:160810:danielhoffman699@gmail.com::uqiXJGxUxytRZejd:9kjj
X-Hashcash: 1:25:160810:trevinhofmann@gmail.com::ojq7AIkjgs=rrILI:a3D0
From: Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org>
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
	Daniel Hoffman <danielhoffman699@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:36:04 +0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/4.1.18-gentoo; KDE/4.14.20; x86_64; ; )
References: <CAL9WuQUUeR3cuUXHxUfBTNJ-+r0iJ-7Z8KRNub0G3NBujnkqcw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAL9WuQUt+CMG2bEX+yv3LrFV7qn-=OSdn02ZxxPQci-3_ykPNQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAL9WuQXsbBJ0UwdS+o=UqJCcsebcPa9Ug5A=uNtc6Z+9CNEFPg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL9WuQXsbBJ0UwdS+o=UqJCcsebcPa9Ug5A=uNtc6Z+9CNEFPg@mail.gmail.com>
X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: E463 A93F 5F31 17EE DE6C 7316 BD02 9424 21F4 889F
X-PGP-Key-ID: BD02942421F4889F
X-PGP-Keyserver: hkp://pgp.mit.edu
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201608100036.05930.luke@dashjr.org>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RDNS_DYNAMIC
	autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Number Request: Addresses over Audio
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:36:31 -0000

On Tuesday, August 09, 2016 11:06:20 PM Daniel Hoffman via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Is this good enough to warrant an official BIP number?

Yeah, let's call it BIP 170.

Next step is to:
- Fix the BIP number in the file
- Format it in the usual BIP mediawiki format instead of markdown
- Add it to a fork of the bitcoin/bips git repository
- Open a pull request against bitcoin/bips

P.S. Why are telephones considered 4-tone? DTMF is 16-tone IIRC?