Return-Path: Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D72F6C002D for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 08:52:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD0BB40502 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 08:52:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org DD0BB40502 Authentication-Results: smtp2.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=notatether.com header.i=@notatether.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=protonmail header.b=KsYmQ2Ed X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IF1BOX92UkEO for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 08:52:47 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org C7B814017B Received: from mail-41103.protonmail.ch (mail-41103.protonmail.ch [185.70.41.103]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7B814017B for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 08:52:46 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 08:52:32 +0000 Authentication-Results: mail-41103.protonmail.ch; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=notatether.com header.i=@notatether.com header.b="KsYmQ2Ed" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=notatether.com; s=protonmail; t=1658825555; x=1659084755; bh=JRdYDnVUuZfNWekgnoJODMaPZ/265jf7YoriZnC4w4I=; h=Date:To:From:Reply-To:Subject:Message-ID:Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc: Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID:Message-ID; b=KsYmQ2EdA+6HnAgkuMLWYyZS3pELeMOtGwia9S2VFg5d+H9XnWGJp3Ph3FXw5jvQn Erw91XrHavEuppWSyjd1Qv7bMuQyE2BgXYv3WPEFYRmPkkN7shgZSoZ4giw9AueN35 wmaQhVbw66htN/5vCT8vMx8OLurS1BzSAAoI+7ulrdYgDMMpSOpiHeKH7OTEePDwsj I9BuGMy3DeryzLeLl+vUzW8poYIAaXuqPEQmyfAExVAGZapnUoLNyfflKcfUYAKkXe YOzMsJjUd4bKhFDrHEsOo6d+H7ZHxC8Vcxl9iQk4toEyzujemeXt5iE1/Qz0EqUwop QQ1TWYw0NW4Rw== To: "bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" From: Ali Sherief Reply-To: Ali Sherief Message-ID: <_FL_iRf6I5dKwL-X4rEu1qhLGfBA1VG4d5CuMoI217T5jAvIxqBPXKeiAWIGoOrLtVMY1e2mkAiKxQ1Pga8ZtySccPnkA3bjbubPKzUxFWQ=@notatether.com> Feedback-ID: 34210769:user:proton MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 08:57:05 +0000 Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Discussion about message verification draft BIP X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 08:52:50 -0000 Hi guys, I have created a discussion thread for my draft BIP related to mes= sage verification on BitcoinTalk:=C2=A0https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?to= pic=3D5407517.0 Feel free to read it and contribute if you wish. - Ali