To: Jared Lee Richardson <jaredr26@gmail.com>,
	Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
References: <CABerxhFY8NoA6sSiz1oZ=01Di8n9+QR1xE6NNtxvm=Ov1bGhWQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<9eb001f8-7623-3c79-41bb-7ed6e45b43ae@voskuil.org>
	<CAD1TkXtQ8d-yBPtGfzA8E0XMv9vR3Qc0xawpwE6yJgzRH-t5ug@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eric Voskuil <eric@voskuil.org>
Message-ID: <2a2b6fc0-f800-2646-55b3-1501cb5d5a30@voskuil.org>
Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2017 00:41:46 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
	Thunderbird/45.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAD1TkXtQ8d-yBPtGfzA8E0XMv9vR3Qc0xawpwE6yJgzRH-t5ug@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Hard fork proposal from last week's meeting
Precedence: list

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 03/31/2017 11:18 PM, Jared Lee Richardson wrote:
>> If a typical personal computer cannot run a node there is no
>> security.
> 
> If you can't describe an attack that is made possible when typical 
> personal computers can't run nodes, this kind of logic has no place
> in this discussion.

"Governments are good at cutting off the heads of a centrally
controlled networks..."

e
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJY31m0AAoJEDzYwH8LXOFOayIH/0DcWukHZUVTV8952mkWnqjS
RCM8StQOuuTQ/2elvKoZa/nEv1PvpOQEO/AxJDEdIKOqjdXoc/QdZT/Qj834yyFi
mmNLm3x8voO7rTFEVtBrXQ4VYO7Zj5gVy6nRyMrhSGtzg4XqYiyGVoijiumfXOvq
ejLwyWJEf8klBwegIPkX4XX6UYjNyBt+E32Je7NxUbi54EPDRszWpEGGKfJrWiCQ
JO2jqB3O2RbMd0J1onBt2AGsjeQSE3HO0EBQSkdGQZ7PVSdE3I49uT2aAaScnPOt
ymbNz4QtlUWWpUgEI6VSjxHCGjX4+Vrn3HLRwjLe4nS2EX3mOVNY8MHMvbCeAuY=
=tD9k
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----