Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TQ0YY-0006ys-H1 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 18:47:26 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 74.125.82.53 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.53; envelope-from=mh.in.england@gmail.com; helo=mail-wg0-f53.google.com; Received: from mail-wg0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53]) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1TQ0YX-0005eW-Jg for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 18:47:26 +0000 Received: by mail-wg0-f53.google.com with SMTP id dr1so1319747wgb.10 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 11:47:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.195.229 with SMTP id p79mr4021991wen.163.1350845239516; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 11:47:19 -0700 (PDT) Sender: mh.in.england@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.236.30 with HTTP; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 11:47:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 20:47:19 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: C3d1FL9NPKUNCH535O33zCvgRPw Message-ID: From: Mike Hearn To: Gavin Andresen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (mh.in.england[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1TQ0YX-0005eW-Jg Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Public key and signature malleability X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 18:47:26 -0000 No objections. On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Gavin Andresen wrote: > Any objections from other transaction-validating implementations? > > I strongly support more precisely defining the transaction validity > rules by changing the reference implementation. > > -- > -- > Gavin Andresen > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. > Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics > Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct > _______________________________________________ > Bitcoin-development mailing list > Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development