Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1WfUzU-0003gG-D8 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 13:56:04 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.219.50 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.219.50; envelope-from=mh.in.england@gmail.com; helo=mail-oa0-f50.google.com; Received: from mail-oa0-f50.google.com ([209.85.219.50]) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1WfUzS-0001ff-Gn for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 13:56:04 +0000 Received: by mail-oa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id i11so1955235oag.23 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 06:55:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.134.137 with SMTP id pk9mr5474304oeb.40.1398866157168; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 06:55:57 -0700 (PDT) Sender: mh.in.england@gmail.com Received: by 10.76.96.180 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 06:55:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5360F6BE.5000703@gmail.com> References: <5359E509.4080907@gmail.com> <535A60FE.10209@gmail.com> <535BA357.6050607@gmail.com> <535CFDB4.1000200@gmail.com> <20140428214102.GA8347@netbook.cypherspace.org> <5360F6BE.5000703@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 15:55:56 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 6xbRgitqV6sDOHE424NrLVZB0Ws Message-ID: From: Mike Hearn To: Gareth Williams Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b471dfa62ebea04f842e869 X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (mh.in.england[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1WfUzS-0001ff-Gn Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Coinbase reallocation to discourage Finney attacks X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 13:56:04 -0000 --047d7b471dfa62ebea04f842e869 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I think we're going around in circles here so this will be my last message on the thread unless someone comes up with something new. On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Gareth Williams wrote: > If Bitcoin works correctly nobody should have to care if they consider > themselves attackers, defenders, or little green men from Mars. One last time, I request that people read the white paper from 2008 before making statements like this. If the notion of attacker was irrelevant to Bitcoin, it would not be mentioned in the abstract, would it? --047d7b471dfa62ebea04f842e869 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I think we're going around in circles here so this wil= l be my last message on the thread unless someone comes up with something n= ew.

On Wed, Apr 30= , 2014 at 3:12 PM, Gareth Williams <gacrux@gmail.com> wrote:<= br>
If Bitcoin works correctly n= obody should have to care if they consider
themselves attackers, defenders, or little green men from Mars.

One last time, I request that people read the white pa= per from 2008 before making statements like this. If the notion of attacker= was irrelevant to Bitcoin, it would not be mentioned in the abstract, woul= d it?=C2=A0
--047d7b471dfa62ebea04f842e869--