Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FB91CD0 for ; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 19:34:34 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-vk0-f54.google.com (mail-vk0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE478EC for ; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 19:34:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vk0-f54.google.com with SMTP id a188so166913659vkc.0 for ; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 11:34:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jtimon-cc.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=64vBi40BzxujlNl8kCixKCiy0bxxblCLLs0eYd+KmZM=; b=k2Kp1+32Z58hNWT7BqNmQNebNjWmJf9XYM61XfjK+9rMEcz0bfu+5HaBv3bHG4yy4j Pbw/HdT3gsdyeogKjN8qrAUuGODLH70of+IkMXScT1DLtQA9fkonr085PPWKpsjhlaGB 03Wr5WxcaqK7V2K4slcOnkmOrSVmPowoBfMYs0xUGUyW0y7skWbYbjZjpPAXwrM43Lec W0Jze19AozwHNUJdF0C5mJO8k4KJpGNjpNHDE2WenKccuig3P3EeHuNmBcoe9GXWqib1 tmjZW9CYJW2wfslCpW3JLTSiF2QB0QIUSEdm2Zh8T04RIkhFrDHXAV9J2reXmaBxZvD4 J3iw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=64vBi40BzxujlNl8kCixKCiy0bxxblCLLs0eYd+KmZM=; b=Cmitb7ecuUDoS96YmO4HurGV93wY1ZNFCNldqmE1bZlUXnOtX7VBaDrn1NiQPz60qI zp0zlU0/lbYX3HQlnL6ZhA3uS7kLipdgNfeQ24hTjRfaSIYvyETPzncvvxKNs1+bmm2S XALVNF/1p703s0okDcmw+6z3GKFAoTfuF4qOFk5P81vKUrkF3/KzllTsJX0g9hb/tvNi l7md4qfi/3kh+tNfeucCcsIg/ZpJ/tp+0uweGy2jA+ciFAgYR717dJmkY63LhSWQOZXB 9wt6DTLMZi7WYCOGfmAbedF96HoLReq2LGdALFsQeKg9XVQUkzX2yLHExRgwd9p5Eput a7vQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmSbBlFjRPZPLzxQyiXhCYu31RehZCcKDvMHPX3BFqOkne6oUW2PNlyYdWXUoXXFq2zp00gcw6c61Z8+gPKPv25WAvBmQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.31.16.226 with SMTP id 95mr29575548vkq.143.1451158472886; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 11:34:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.31.141.73 with HTTP; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 11:34:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.31.141.73 with HTTP; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 11:34:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <99F2E7CA-42BF-432F-B371-F00DA145B817@gmail.com> References: <20151220132842.GA25481@muck> <99F2E7CA-42BF-432F-B371-F00DA145B817@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 20:34:32 +0100 Message-ID: From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= To: Eric Lombrozo Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114339404a22450527d2290a X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] We need to fix the block withholding attack X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 19:34:34 -0000 --001a114339404a22450527d2290a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Dec 26, 2015 7:30 PM, "Eric Lombrozo via bitcoin-dev" < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > I should have stated that we're assuming the actual total hashrate remains constant. But that's not reasonable if you are assuming that the total reward per unit of time drops, that's what confused me. --001a114339404a22450527d2290a Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8


On Dec 26, 2015 7:30 PM, "Eric Lombrozo via bitcoin-dev" <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> I should have stated that we're assuming the actual total hashrate remains constant.

But that's not reasonable if you are assuming that the total reward per unit of time drops, that's what confused me.

--001a114339404a22450527d2290a--