Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.192.174 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.192.174; envelope-from=wtogami@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-pd0-f174.google.com; 
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20130816145912.GA16533@petertodd.org>
References: <CABsx9T32q8mKgtmsaZgh7nuhHY5cExeW=FiadzXq3jXVP=NBTw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANEZrP0PEcP339MKRyrHXHCCsP3BxRHT-ZfKRQ7G2Ou+15CD7A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANEZrP3LAR0erjgmTHruLwPNDdx-OVyb9KK52E6UnmE4ZuBrvQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20130816140116.GB16201@petertodd.org>
	<20130816141536.GD16201@petertodd.org>
	<CAEz79PoK9u9ffJ5jR8yXk8eCFP0Ytk_bno0mpcpM24mt-GGg5w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANEZrP3hHh3k5+ePGbqVeyo3oV=RTy36FA+8MbOZXg3yMqRxAw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20130816145912.GA16533@petertodd.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 05:06:22 -1000
Message-ID: <CAEz79Pq105f-cFLijb6gEkgjdjW5JtbhFzd1W5umSmk8mAY+TQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Warren Togami Jr." <wtogami@gmail.com>
To: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b11201b06a6a504e411ef08
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Gavin's post-0.9 TODO list...
Precedence: list

--047d7b11201b06a6a504e411ef08
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

I might agree this would be helpful for the many phones plugged into power
and on wifi for large portions of the day.  However that doesn't really
help much when phone IP addresses change often as you move onto different
networks, and currently IP address is the only thing that peers can keep
track of for the goodness of a peer as there is no roaming pseudo-identity
cookie due to separate goal of anonymity?  I haven't studied the issue if
would be even possible to have both privacy protection and unique node
identifiers for anti-DoS authentication at the same time.

On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 4:59 AM, Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org> wrote:

> The user interface for this stuff is very simple: "How much bandwidth
> will you contribute back? If you contribute more bandwidth back, other
> peers will prioritize you and your wallet will be more reliable."
>
> --
> 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
> 000000000000003cfc051263917373a1cab2655994b97c54a625021f52c84658
>

--047d7b11201b06a6a504e411ef08
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">I might agree this would be helpful for the many phones pl=
ugged into power and on wifi for large portions of the day. =C2=A0However t=
hat doesn&#39;t really help much when phone IP addresses change often as yo=
u move onto different networks, and currently IP address is the only thing =
that peers can keep track of for the goodness of a peer as there is no roam=
ing pseudo-identity cookie due to separate goal of anonymity? =C2=A0I haven=
&#39;t studied the issue if would be even possible to have both privacy pro=
tection and unique node identifiers for anti-DoS authentication at the same=
 time.<br>
<div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Fri, Aug 16, 2=
013 at 4:59 AM, Peter Todd <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:pete@pet=
ertodd.org" target=3D"_blank">pete@petertodd.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><=
blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px=
 #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class=3D"im"><span style=3D"color:rgb(34,34,34)">The user interface fo=
r this stuff is very simple: &quot;How much bandwidth</span><br></div>
will you contribute back? If you contribute more bandwidth back, other<br>
peers will prioritize you and your wallet will be more reliable.&quot;<br>
<span class=3D"HOEnZb"><font color=3D"#888888"><br>
--<br>
&#39;peter&#39;[:-1]@<a href=3D"http://petertodd.org" target=3D"_blank">pet=
ertodd.org</a><br>
000000000000003cfc051263917373a1cab2655994b97c54a625021f52c84658<br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br></div></div>

--047d7b11201b06a6a504e411ef08--