Return-Path: Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::136]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29856C0012; Thu, 9 Dec 2021 09:13:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09A41607FF; Thu, 9 Dec 2021 09:13:16 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.4 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: smtp3.osuosl.org (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=petertodd.org Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HjId-HYdRxM4; Thu, 9 Dec 2021 09:13:12 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 Received: from outmail149115.authsmtp.co.uk (outmail149115.authsmtp.co.uk [62.13.149.115]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49D9B607F8; Thu, 9 Dec 2021 09:13:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-c233.authsmtp.com (mail-c233.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.233]) by punt16.authsmtp.com. (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 1B99D5Y7026447; Thu, 9 Dec 2021 09:13:05 GMT (envelope-from user@petertodd.org) Received: from petertodd.org (76-10-157-59.dsl.teksavvy.com [76.10.157.59]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.authsmtp.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 1B99D3SJ090956 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 9 Dec 2021 09:13:04 GMT (envelope-from user@petertodd.org) Received: by petertodd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6B51B9E445; Thu, 9 Dec 2021 04:13:02 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=petertodd.org; s=mail; t=1639041182; bh=qjsoQ0Dwlb8tLXU972ClhLiY9rH4szwVD7Z76mW7AkQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=HjHA+nZSAAhYdCu77Ve0fdf73ht63UeDGpFGq0E03in+9PwAyVNg6bCgljuQv86n3 3U3a/y0nva4xNHJjBtmevMApXvRWFNuj2A+jskSiz9G/QMXUcrLziQ01uQ3HJwLS8A uYpiWpdglR+H58jkmirgwQoq8XYGaiPSbpjkyOkAUjk9sLe/93r9O/EjLxOm/cGNN5 p1+gyupBeMwBCKatrlOnEwGbP9AddsjdA9MhqiHf4CS8ao4IhBasEpw0xvxMS3VH4I urUz0LGu/4aQ+NrlUNea1FUERXIBEy1XCKXJD7jQVCvlt1zUvKdOPLkdtm0gtAfLWY l+6lC0c+jn7wQ== Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 628D65FB52; Thu, 9 Dec 2021 04:12:59 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2021 04:12:59 -0500 From: Peter Todd To: Christian Moss , Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OGIXMbLK528CGqgc" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Server-Quench: 37ca57bd-58d0-11ec-a0f2-84349711df28 X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at: http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZIVwkA IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR bwdMdgsUHFAXAgsB AWcbW11eUV57WWY7 bAxPbAVDY09JQQBj T0pMXVMcFXdhCGgC ZWQeWxl7cgMIeXh2 Z0YsXXcIDUF9JxJg R0YAFXAHZDIzdTEf BkJFfwdXdApNfx4R PFJ3GhFYa3VsNCMk FAgyOXU9MCtqYBdx Qw4NMVQTR0lOEjMi clg5EDMjHEsKDwIL GCYLFmMmOg4PM0x6 G1o9UlUZNX1aLgxR H11LASlWTwAI X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1021:7600 X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255) X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 76.10.157.59/25 X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own anti-virus system. Cc: lightning-dev , =?iso-8859-1?Q?H=E9ctor_Jos=E9_C=E1rdenas?= Pacheco Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Lightning-dev] Sending OP_RETURN via Bitcoin Lightning X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2021 09:13:16 -0000 --OGIXMbLK528CGqgc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 04:35:19PM +0000, Christian Moss via bitcoin-dev wr= ote: > As far as I understand it, RGB doesn't scale NFTs as each > transaction to transfer ownership of an NFT would require an onchain > transaction RGB intends to scale NFTs and similar things in the future via scalable single-use-seals: https://petertodd.org/2017/scalable-single-use-seal-asset= -transfer --=20 https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org --OGIXMbLK528CGqgc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEE0RcYcKRzsEwFZ3N5Lly11TVRLzcFAmGxyJkACgkQLly11TVR LzcgFRAAuWcJthheFl68Kr7zaKHd3h6lCg+qNUKmulX2h9NwEAxj+2eLjPMBZrxl 09sdCWJODv9nHKPHblvFllHh68sTdWHfTR5Yzltc25eltkGUbm2bkHAcU8B4MXBQ 1z44SoKLnXkStlk3Xi0Sr87y1DWGKsHWQPGgWG36O/nvz0MN2CUnVG8LSM7T+WWz HOS5S5dW9PFJbgvfVchDXC3b5Q48LVZi2caTV0lseDNFWrMcscyNnBEAs7wC26JF 7Z9SU9HHnfGVWGAf0paksbhxfCIj5Vd8SbsNYRT2AkIXKIQSv47O2jtT1HGFPA3m papWb1Sq02O+rwUWuS/zPL3M15iPEQ02PJDO6SgVe0mJ4q4B7B8pwpHgYvY8Ot6m EjR9c07EOtes5t+VU+we3K0e27etDAnNMbLDHIErX7It58VjFs2Ee3RQ65hRn2Wf LAmCesKa10CXidlfSCkKjERMBchoUhxLrVa48kJMdqoOnGIyV6JzRewHICWRGNIB Lnv1lLSd+5ibpd8A6sCPRQVMrrgSbilJj/z5BupaPBn4oNMV2Sxni2smioFNSOb4 nOQEyckr+Hem/0sYFMTkgNa3jn5pSIWKJNI4DbHTnLgWwU6nryKkxeHeZ5EPd+jr yZx3gcT7Xq8/FMvvCwEHr4g3oqW/IkiEJ6oDoXULbT8wJ80TSXg= =dKwc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OGIXMbLK528CGqgc--