Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9E0DE28 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 13:40:00 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-ob0-f169.google.com (mail-ob0-f169.google.com [209.85.214.169]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5175B102 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 13:40:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obkg7 with SMTP id g7so16075444obk.3 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 06:39:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=nyVvrjCUJM7ryjxh0SPYLEKcCvTbc/XD+Y7XzQfYdf0=; b=M4kWTyG2HEsYdt5kFGsDEvG2pKweNAjWrmJYKLRGU4FT+pS9wePw7mXhby8TmWxiiB pYeQDuiIG0h2UG1LNf8lx0lsFrpFg2/yXD8gMKY5B/AqH5zdpj+wI8wJOVNdfaYXb49n 1CoENpOxx3JFF3pzoW8yGi5YB7szMb85wIarfLbVJRqY1obKeIBCJg8tbWJ8QgswcxLP dQqtrIWRS677vlMwmAVLLY6SfPBQKTc3e9UxH802hxJ2O1Nmc89mJEt7KEeZqNxHE1wx SVFy+zdIlzk6QXi5HD4r4ssdAMrleMqy+CJ0Vyiw6QErzzgaKM5/tLC5KIKT/07laoa7 NwWw== X-Received: by 10.182.214.9 with SMTP id nw9mr2459028obc.33.1440682799781; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 06:39:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.202.45.214 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 06:39:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: prabhat Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 19:09:40 +0530 Message-ID: To: Gavin Andresen Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8ff1c9e283df78051e4b1abf X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIPS proposal for implementing AML-KYC in bitcoin X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 13:40:00 -0000 --e89a8ff1c9e283df78051e4b1abf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Fine point. So where is the solution? What to do? Prabhat Kumar Singh Prabhat Kumar Singh On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 6:58 PM, Gavin Andresen wrote: > Have you talked with anybody at the Bitcoin Foundation about this proposal? > > As Chief Scientist of the Foundation, I am strongly opposed to any > proposal that puts the Foundation in a position of centralized authority, > so this is unacceptable: "The Bitcoin Foundation will act as fair play > party and enforcement body to control the misuse of vast financial powers > which bitcoin has." > > The idea that a central organization can be trusted to keep secrets secure > is just fundamentally wrong. In the very recent past we have seen > government organizations fail in that task (the NSA, the OPM) and we see > commercial organizations that SHOULD be highly motivated to do a good job > also fail (e.g. the Ashley Madison leak). > > Even if it were technically possible, I would be opposed because > decentralization is a bedrock principle of Bitcoin. > > -- > -- > Gavin Andresen > --e89a8ff1c9e283df78051e4b1abf Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Fi= ne point.

So where is the solution? What to do?

Prabhat Kumar Singh

Prabhat Kumar S= ingh


On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 6:58 PM, Gavin Andre= sen <gavinandresen@gmail.com> wrote:
Have you talked with anybody at the Bitco= in Foundation about this proposal?

As Chief Scientist of= the Foundation, I am strongly opposed to any proposal that puts the Founda= tion in a position of centralized authority, so this is unacceptable: "= ;The Bitcoin Foundation will act as fair play party and enforcement body to= control the misuse of vast financial powers which bitcoin has."
=

The idea that a central organization can be trusted to = keep secrets secure is just fundamentally wrong. In the very recent past we= have seen government organizations fail in that task (the NSA, the OPM) an= d we see commercial organizations that SHOULD be highly motivated to do a g= ood job also fail (e.g. the Ashley Madison leak).

= Even if it were technically possible, I would be opposed because decentrali= zation is a bedrock principle of Bitcoin.

--
--=
Gavin Andresen

--e89a8ff1c9e283df78051e4b1abf--