Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD514EE1 for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 12:28:54 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-wm0-f48.google.com (mail-wm0-f48.google.com [74.125.82.48]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F45A122 for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 12:28:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wmuu63 with SMTP id u63so220091410wmu.0 for ; Wed, 09 Dec 2015 04:28:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=UsSlCE8Bo7ippWGGNs8xOToJTuc+4CFU3WnyUlQhFW8=; b=JAm7EOCazUOnL/TOJLJMR7ntsaJ/H/tfatP3blOfR5lbdeBE3ldTC3+BkM443kMvQh bvoCRNwTs3aV5XSMZoE6c0MYxCp6FJEQlwQxxIJZqhDqqttWRZ+2kJyS0hxz4F1EI67Y 3/A3DFy6tsu2AhkfqA82A0ddAWSbu/rystgTnxsnUCqI+aJIOBcSy3dv2xbZbjtsh1k3 /2AtvM5EtS4vLpYl9ypUJuwIUZiDccHZpkx2Pfwo+7rRnxjzZJacuXKPRniSImqyD327 u044QbuvHTaQ+bFcFRVhapI69LUWI+wuvDOYj/uAZoGPS36RFcAiUO7Q9NHMel27JnFN t/jg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.28.49.3 with SMTP id x3mr35668073wmx.53.1449664132788; Wed, 09 Dec 2015 04:28:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.28.63.1 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 04:28:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.28.63.1 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 04:28:52 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 13:28:52 +0100 Message-ID: From: Daniele Pinna To: Bitcoin Dev Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1142b97aadb8670526763bb0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 09 Dec 2015 16:13:46 +0000 Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Capacity increases for the Bitcoin system. X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2015 12:28:54 -0000 --001a1142b97aadb8670526763bb0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 If SegWit were implemented as a hardfork, could the entire blockchain be reorganized starting from the Genesis block to free up historical space? --001a1142b97aadb8670526763bb0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

If SegWit were implemented as a hardfork, could the entire blockchain be reorganized starting from the Genesis block to free up historical space?

--001a1142b97aadb8670526763bb0--