Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6AA1BE4 for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 16:31:18 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-ig0-f175.google.com (mail-ig0-f175.google.com [209.85.213.175]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3464B13E for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 16:31:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ig0-f175.google.com with SMTP id h5so69907300igh.0 for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 08:31:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=JlW+42e/ZuFOnn8DlvevVazrxM20F0qxiC+skHZHV2Q=; b=eRNztjimHetM1er94ITw4dg0EU5+cMSC1d2TVXUUPvIr0NldGYX81gLVWCWmr2V4Tz OaKBZi3+HLtpmjVMveY6p1+K0y5+Rbz+RArWSNumJVbAMR9NhEPeQl1EGd3gy1X/SA8r d2QjGQrxfyudQHT/lg1y/Qks7OmnSBu5oyZjd/284BTNpL4fUuP7uNxColEv8XXvKM+M Ge/Ids80y9qT9HZNU6lYT69A3duK+9sNi8m503rdndRWmp75GlQO2aw4D0Cx8ixnFOfx 29GboHHDx9Kusl+wWqznMy+orFgenf0Zwykv+TQNOqwvm7MHO/ktOR1J9QZrJySflvil KFHA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=JlW+42e/ZuFOnn8DlvevVazrxM20F0qxiC+skHZHV2Q=; b=ivMHekkoqYSlrHV8IbBb2gkwTUcSzIqQL92z/DIipwpRCN94GoItrnWdgh+v16xloA AM6tkmCKrj0kYysuwQ0zbSRlonXW3ui8N4FSXUMzpvpOnD+PlAhujLArwuRUp+EQuy2v cpN+2WlmAtTOhPqFsYJy9WwZmt1oUchoIziv6XKEX9hWbhwzB0l94LgtH97f5KX8unG7 t9xJXdGH4L3ngo46t/CPLMU/XtGOwFcjocFqstPHJshjlx7HaZUkEVKlAvR+OW9+fF0g 1SiL+sPF8wYy7z9XtxBNoxxnliknak08ct3AEWqWkvzpgFIGw4c23b0L5lKSqsYlRP5M pYGA== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOT2OSij9OX3loV8P4HfQOHN6fzEOADZycUIQ5shW6ZpUNsY3mqWkGsu8Qy36+yisPZfIEiAmVmGKUo0hg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.30.134 with SMTP id s6mr15547347igh.36.1453221077710; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 08:31:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.36.184.3 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 08:31:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <46426D6D-E4DB-4CB6-A63A-4388A9286B2F@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 10:31:17 -0600 Message-ID: From: Bryan Bishop To: Mark Friedenbach , Bryan Bishop Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bdc184a1e05490529b2661f X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 16:31:37 +0000 Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Segregated Witness App Development X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 16:31:18 -0000 --047d7bdc184a1e05490529b2661f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Mark Friedenbach via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > Wouldn't this be entirely on topic for #bitcoin-dev? It's probably better > not to fragment the communication channels and associated infrastructure > (logs, bots, etc.) Yeah, I agree that this is on topic for #bitcoin-dev. I think that if segwit discussion got to the point of clouding out all other development discussions, then perhaps it would be time for a new channel. I would definitely like to see segwit discussion not fragmented into a separate venue. - Bryan http://heybryan.org/ 1 512 203 0507 --047d7bdc184a1e05490529b2661f Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On T= ue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Mark Friedenbach via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
=
Wouldn't this be entirely on topic for #= bitcoin-dev? It's probably better not to fragment the communication cha= nnels and associated infrastructure (logs, bots, etc.)
Yeah, I agree that this is on topic for #bitcoin-dev. I think that if seg= wit discussion got to the point of clouding out all other development discu= ssions, then perhaps it would be time for a new channel. I would definitely= like to see segwit discussion not fragmented into a separate venue.

- Bryan
http://heybryan.org/
1 512 203 0507
--047d7bdc184a1e05490529b2661f--