Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1VqQxL-0007dA-EP for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 17:18:47 +0000 Received: from mail-vb0-f51.google.com ([209.85.212.51]) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1VqQxJ-0000U5-Tl for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 17:18:47 +0000 Received: by mail-vb0-f51.google.com with SMTP id 11so755607vbe.24 for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 09:18:40 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=T0E8UYkxKNI3bGCteZ53onVbFWf1ue7cHqqcJU2hB3s=; b=Kk9fAxLpzTwqq8pSwnDKqA0R7MXORIfxP8pTts/H4NzT8elCA0e0SZRjNqsSdyDrab gFtl/fp8uTu4mbWuOucbNxDF+Rc4IbDWoYUtf6JtyeTsTcKDWKY4XKYi/ztX2xnFeTAH oLUcP8HJzjCFr2FZ4zyZNOM6KJg4GXg3OB5uJ64lfapVCZC3FYM1elOQnNGBmnjtQ6zJ JVWdj5ReOgAPpVgsIlO6Sd50NM0+T/kq+LFi5S4er05k93wewBHwFalf5GIeqyV1De1u HfhbjQCNO0f2eYH9UBMRD1GSmThtB4i30k8ZpGfph/nlZhugyw6AEIFiWNvYtQIh6hm7 3aHg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm78ji0wnUTZVZWrIlHwvQwtYyza+uQc31za1kvv7g2x+BENH3fR/rFqCa0l5oANFHOZ6Mb MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.0.81 with SMTP id 17mr447231vdc.50.1386695920270; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 09:18:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.221.22.69 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 09:18:40 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [85.53.148.91] In-Reply-To: <52A740EE.1020605@gmail.com> References: <52A740EE.1020605@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 18:18:40 +0100 Message-ID: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Tim=F3n?= To: Jameson Lopp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: doubleclick.net] X-Headers-End: 1VqQxJ-0000U5-Tl Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Popularity based mining (variable block reward) X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 17:18:47 -0000 This has been asked very recently: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=3Dbitcoin-developme= nt And a thousand times on bitcointalk. On 12/10/13, Jameson Lopp wrote: > > "no reliance on external data" ... "depending on various factors (coin > valuation/exchange rate" > > =E0=B2=A0_=E0=B2=A0 > -- > Jameson Lopp > Software Engineer > Bronto Software > > On 12/10/2013 11:23 AM, Jan Ku=C4=8Dera wrote: >> Basically there would be no reliance on external data as the network >> itself >> would decide on reward height and everybody node would be free to do so. >> Each network node would determine the popularity on its own depending on >> various factors (coin valuation/exchange rate, number of transactions an= d >> many others) and basically come up with its own block reward value. > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- > Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT > organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance > affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into you= r > Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics > Pro! > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=3D84349831&iu=3D/4140/ostg.= clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Bitcoin-development mailing list > Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development > --=20 Jorge Tim=C3=B3n http://freico.in/