Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TRkzI-0008Bx-RP for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 14:34:16 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.210.175 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.210.175; envelope-from=gmaxwell@gmail.com; helo=mail-ia0-f175.google.com; Received: from mail-ia0-f175.google.com ([209.85.210.175]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1TRkzD-0000IA-JZ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 14:34:16 +0000 Received: by mail-ia0-f175.google.com with SMTP id b35so2397148iac.34 for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 07:34:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.15.226 with SMTP id a2mr2445857igd.5.1351262046347; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 07:34:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.171.73 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 07:34:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 10:34:06 -0400 Message-ID: From: Gregory Maxwell To: Mike Hearn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (gmaxwell[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-Headers-End: 1TRkzD-0000IA-JZ Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Draft BIP for Bloom filtering X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 14:34:17 -0000 On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Mike Hearn wrote: > Anyway, it's trivial to DoS the entire Bitcoin network today. It > hasn't ever happened. Maybe one day it will, but the only rationale > people can come up with for such an attack beyond random griefing is Which happens and is a concern. Altcoins have been attacked on things we fixed. For example, litecoin nodes were being run out of disk space through addr.dat flooding. I think we've been generally fortunate that the level of griefing is low (though not non-existent). But part of the reason its been low is that it's probably harder to DOS attack bitcoin than you believe. In the reference client a lot of work has gone in to removing attacks with sublinear cost for the attackers. That people aren't attacking much now is not an argument to accept a new vulnerability much less a _normative_ vulnerability in the protocol. That it's no big deal even attacked would be a fine argument to me, so I'll go try to convince myself of that. > governments, Please don't put that kind of black helicopter junk in my mouth. I agree with you the point that these aren't a source of concern for me.