Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Xfkkg-0000QB-NU for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 07:18:06 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from smtprelay05.ispgateway.de ([80.67.31.94]) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) id 1Xfkkf-000748-76 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 07:18:06 +0000 Received: from [89.12.99.57] (helo=anonymous) by smtprelay05.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1XfkkY-0003cJ-M3 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 09:17:58 +0200 From: xor To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 09:17:51 +0200 Message-ID: <2753630.UjohjSx8jx@1337h4x0r> Organization: Freenet Project User-Agent: KMail/4.13.3 (Linux/3.13.0-37-generic; KDE/4.13.3; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2010651.nOTlrCUOBv"; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Df-Sender: eG9yQGZyZWVtYWlsLmJvZ2VydC5kZQ== X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.67.31.94 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) X-Headers-End: 1Xfkkf-000748-76 Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP process X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: xor@freenetproject.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 07:18:06 -0000 --nextPart2010651.nOTlrCUOBv Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Wednesday, October 15, 2014 10:29:43 AM Wladimir wrote: > B) I also think it makes sense to move the BIP discussion (both about > the BIP process and individual BIPs) to a separate mailing list. > > bitcoin-development currently has a dual function: discussion of > Bitcoin Core implementation concerns, as well as global changes to > Bitcoin (in the form of BIPs). > > This makes the list too busy for some people, but it is critical that > everyone writing a Bitcoin node or client is up-to-date with proposals > and can comment on them. I joined the list when Bitcoin was already in the 10-billions of market capitalization, and it actually really surprised me how low the traffic is here given the importance of Bitcoin. So as a random stranger to the project, I would vote against that if I was allowed to. There really should be *more* discussion here, and splitting the list up won't help with that. Greetings --nextPart2010651.nOTlrCUOBv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABCAAGBQJUQ2WlAAoJEMtmZ+8tjWt5XcUP/RxhOytwKAJTZ2RrHhi/HAbZ FM5GKFH+7H+bks5ND8NDKybGENUg7beMsOjf5SqeDlMtqdLYvH2KLH+9WM/dBJc5 AZoKmj2n95LukFAwGW6IzxJQqCcmyS0xb0F4+X5+K3IQzEroFeMhgEn4OSqtuMtS kfr2cCVYaziHtS9YcGYZlggiClTl3O8gHfahRqc3zSDY7mn1tSyg23/EVltcuMgQ r4Dhr2dun+2Ejc8jMBp0dRYQ79SfqLTVAiVwS3f/fEizg4KL3R9Ha8mGQ3/90UBc jn2K/s+mndmtXwMtSegkJrQg7bpKtxhhe3iWoCtNzm4I+3oF64wYhdm7RWhMglcu Ddu4gMRnNCX3FRZMw78zmUiC+TjHNcZ2JAZO+x6krjFI5Sq7AGi3/GKhIQ2ZG8Wn TJ8dM0OuCH9a5lAgsKz1NcaRFwOk/Hs6aNqV9FCQ4d83BJjQGYdDpH9IiS16XrWA hJGEyuIkXGYxjZ7NryoBRp5ACxwB5vNyq1+UvxvsJuInl6TWXKANeMfO3du9oBXI CWQ4/SEf1TEffoc3FWobWgl2hp0HXreD6tQE2+VCNGHt5WRuJek6EaQ63Ww1NLHN P41JFoXFdquB2zfWXuuridRUACnCSCi0TNY+49K/wuVVvhOnMkg42tE5kvNxz5d0 4NDLPTw0HMuxFvZXsYBE =+jWK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2010651.nOTlrCUOBv--