Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RrdtV-00010r-Ub for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 23:10:45 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from zinan.dashjr.org ([173.242.112.54]) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1RrdtT-0002ld-O0 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 23:10:45 +0000 Received: from ishibashi.localnet (fl-184-4-164-217.dhcp.embarqhsd.net [184.4.164.217]) (Authenticated sender: luke-jr) by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 42F78560707; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 23:10:38 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke-Jr" To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 18:10:30 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.1.5-gentoo; KDE/4.7.4; x86_64; ; ) References: <1327876814.85926.YahooMailNeo@web121001.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <1327878150.23803.4.camel@BMThinkPad.lan.bluematt.me> In-Reply-To: <1327878150.23803.4.camel@BMThinkPad.lan.bluematt.me> X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: CE5A D56A 36CC 69FA E7D2 3558 665F C11D D53E 9583 X-PGP-Key-ID: 665FC11DD53E9583 X-PGP-Keyserver: x-hkp://subkeys.pgp.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201201291810.31581.luke@dashjr.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Headers-End: 1RrdtT-0002ld-O0 Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] All pre-BIP BIPs are not valid X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 23:10:46 -0000 On Sunday, January 29, 2012 6:02:30 PM Matt Corallo wrote: > I have to say, I agree with Luke here, this was Finalized a long time > ago. The version that was agreed on can be seen at > https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/BIP_0021 No, that never had a consensus. > Also see https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=6205.0 and Luke's three > biased polls at > https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=6206.0 > https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=6207.0 > https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=6208.0 As everyone can observe from your bitcointalk links, you didn't begin trolling until months after the URI Scheme was Finalized (in January 2011).