Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RJwHZ-000790-Ay for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 23:56:17 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from zinan.dashjr.org ([173.242.112.54]) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1RJwHY-0003TB-9s for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 23:56:17 +0000 Received: from ishibashi.localnet (fl-184-4-160-40.dhcp.embarqhsd.net [184.4.160.40]) (Authenticated sender: luke-jr) by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 44223D90089; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 23:56:10 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke-Jr" To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 19:56:01 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.39-gentoo; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: CE5A D56A 36CC 69FA E7D2 3558 665F C11D D53E 9583 X-PGP-Key-ID: 665FC11DD53E9583 X-PGP-Keyserver: x-hkp://subkeys.pgp.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201110281956.04246.luke@dashjr.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -0.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 T_FRT_PROFILE1 BODY: ReplaceTags: Profile (1) -0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-Headers-End: 1RJwHY-0003TB-9s Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] 0.5 release updated X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 23:56:17 -0000 On Friday, October 28, 2011 2:33:44 PM Gavin Andresen wrote: > Windows builds are being difficult; we need a gcc expert to help debug > the 'gitian' cross-compile (see > https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/587 ). This is an Ubuntu issue. Can't gitian use something else? > I think it'd be spiffy to have a .pro file to compile bitcoind; > maintaining N different makefiles is annoying and error-prone. Better would be a GUI=0/1 option to the bitcoin-qt.pro until a nicer (ideally automake/autoconf) system is implemented...