MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <2419914E-E196-44B4-8663-599AF616A897@friedenbach.org>
References: <5B6756D0-6BEF-4A01-BDB8-52C646916E29@friedenbach.org>
	<26AD157C-A5A9-48C3-8D29-0AD1ED35EDDD@xbt.hk>
	<2419914E-E196-44B4-8663-599AF616A897@friedenbach.org>
From: Bryan Bishop <kanzure@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 21:13:24 -0500
Message-ID: <CABaSBazcE59CczaPLLVz4yuB7qt-kTaZECFYo4_fEWNP_vRt7g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Friedenbach <mark@friedenbach.org>, 
	Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
	Bryan Bishop <kanzure@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Merkle branch verification & tail-call semantics
 for generalized MAST
Precedence: list

On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 9:03 PM, Mark Friedenbach via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> I believe you meant "unclean stack," and you are correct. This was
> also pointed out last tuesday by a participant at the in-person
> CoreDev meetup where the idea was presented.

http://diyhpl.us/wiki/transcripts/bitcoin-core-dev-tech/2017-09-07-merkleized-abstract-syntax-trees/

> > For code complexity, the minimal BIP114 could be really simple, like
> > <30 lines of code? It looks complex now because it does much more
> > than simply hiding scripts in a hash.
>
> Is there a repo that contains the latest implementation of BIP 114,
> for comparison purposes?

original bip114:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/775f26c02696e772dac4060aa092d35dedbc647c/bip-0114.mediawiki
revised bip114: https://github.com/jl2012/bips/blob/vault/bip-0114.mediawiki
https://github.com/jl2012/bitcoin/commits/vault
from https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-September/014963.html

- Bryan
http://heybryan.org/
1 512 203 0507