Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1QcoQZ-0001gs-E7 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 00:51:19 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.220.175 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.220.175; envelope-from=gmaxwell@gmail.com; helo=mail-vx0-f175.google.com; Received: from mail-vx0-f175.google.com ([209.85.220.175]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1QcoQY-00079j-O9 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 00:51:19 +0000 Received: by vxa37 with SMTP id 37so4118981vxa.34 for ; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 17:51:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.161.102 with SMTP id xr6mr1665805vdb.27.1309567873209; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 17:51:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.186.167 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 17:51:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1309567578.2541.26.camel@Desktop666> References: <1309478838.3689.25.camel@Desktop666> <20110701080042.GA657@ulyssis.org> <1309524016.2541.0.camel@Desktop666> <1309567578.2541.26.camel@Desktop666> Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 20:51:12 -0400 Message-ID: From: Gregory Maxwell To: Matt Corallo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (gmaxwell[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1QcoQY-00079j-O9 Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] 0.3.24 X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2011 00:51:19 -0000 On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Matt Corallo wrote: > Personally, I have little preference, sipa and gmaxwell fall on the side > of cherry-pick, but I think it might be good to do a broad-base test of > CWallet in 0.3.24 so potential bugs can be found in it before crypto and > 0.4. In either case, I dont think we should spend too much time as this > is just a minor update release, just get it out the door so we can focus > on 0.4 (hopefully) without interruption. The fact that this will -rc before full release softens my concern some. I did a lot of semi-automated testing of cwallet+crypto (in the encrypted and non-encrypted states) which I really don't want to redo for cwallet alone.