Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.220.175 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.220.175; envelope-from=gmaxwell@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-vx0-f175.google.com; 
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1309567578.2541.26.camel@Desktop666>
References: <1309478838.3689.25.camel@Desktop666>
	<20110701080042.GA657@ulyssis.org>
	<BANLkTim-QWvtfL65mo3uW7ESiehKOmHjtw@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTi=DWUhGmoHcQB5EPZHF71JE71gcTg@mail.gmail.com>
	<1309524016.2541.0.camel@Desktop666>
	<BANLkTimobc7471uBMLBecYT3vz0GO6RLzQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTinqcaDMci-YmYHpDd1sZ_RT9pEOvw@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTi=zG4o5igBFX=4Yg340B0QGF42RBQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<1309567578.2541.26.camel@Desktop666>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 20:51:12 -0400
Message-ID: <BANLkTin4pUDX9EmNpPkgxg1i6MbkVME0GQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
To: Matt Corallo <bitcoin-list@bluematt.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] 0.3.24
Precedence: list

On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Matt Corallo <bitcoin-list@bluematt.me> wrote:
> Personally, I have little preference, sipa and gmaxwell fall on the side
> of cherry-pick, but I think it might be good to do a broad-base test of
> CWallet in 0.3.24 so potential bugs can be found in it before crypto and
> 0.4. In either case, I dont think we should spend too much time as this
> is just a minor update release, just get it out the door so we can focus
> on 0.4 (hopefully) without interruption.

The fact that this will -rc before full release softens my concern some.

I did a lot of semi-automated testing of cwallet+crypto (in the
encrypted and non-encrypted states) which I really don't want to redo
for cwallet alone.