Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <pete@petertodd.org>) id 1WAfss-00070v-Fr
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Tue, 04 Feb 2014 13:17:50 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of petertodd.org
	designates 62.13.149.58 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=62.13.149.58; envelope-from=pete@petertodd.org;
	helo=outmail149058.authsmtp.co.uk; 
Received: from outmail149058.authsmtp.co.uk ([62.13.149.58])
	by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	id 1WAfsq-0004oU-VL for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Tue, 04 Feb 2014 13:17:50 +0000
Received: from mail-c237.authsmtp.com (mail-c237.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.237])
	by punt14.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id s14DHhcV071286; 
	Tue, 4 Feb 2014 13:17:43 GMT
Received: from savin (76-10-178-109.dsl.teksavvy.com [76.10.178.109])
	(authenticated bits=128)
	by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id s14DHZkI047951
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
	Tue, 4 Feb 2014 13:17:38 GMT
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 08:17:23 -0500
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
Message-ID: <20140204131723.GA10309@savin>
References: <1D8E0828-D07F-46EF-9F9F-5CA83AA9DB59@plan99.net>
	<20140204130312.GA23538@savin>
	<CANEZrP2NyvRKwSEZORjAOq6G7UqLv=F3FjxmGNTPMT10yWGxzw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CANEZrP2NyvRKwSEZORjAOq6G7UqLv=F3FjxmGNTPMT10yWGxzw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Server-Quench: b87d9db1-8d9e-11e3-94fa-002590a135d3
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
	http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
	aAdMdgYUHlAWAgsB AmIbWldeUVp7Wmo7 bAxPbAVDY01GQQRq
	WVdMSlVNFUsrABh1 fnRFKxl2cAxDeTBx Z09mWz4JVEMufBIv
	Q1NcQWRTeGZhPWMC WUQOJh5UcAFPdx8U a1N6AHBDAzANdhES
	HhM4ODE3eDlSNilR RRkIIFQOdA4BHyI3 QBEEH313WxRcDz8+
	KxEvMVMQWA4OM1ky eUN7QlJcexUTElYP fQlEBiMRP1AQQict
	EUtCR0kCFzZaRW9H HwUwJQVUagAA
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1024:706
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 76.10.178.109/587
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
	anti-virus system.
X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	0.0 T_FRT_LOLITA1          BODY: ReplaceTags: Lolita (1)
X-Headers-End: 1WAfsq-0004oU-VL
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] bitcoinj 0.11 released, with p2sh,
 bip39 and payment protocol support
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 13:17:50 -0000


--OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 02:13:12PM +0100, Mike Hearn wrote:
> Hah, good point. If nobody completes the homework, I'll post a fixed
> version tomorrow :)

Heh, here's another 25mBTC while we're at it:

https://github.com/opentimestamps/opentimestamps-client/commit/288f3c176269=
74de7eaef4f1c9b5cd93eecf40f6

Why is that a bad idea?

Bonus question: What was I smoking? (hint: where do I live?)

> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org> wrote:
>=20
> > On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 01:01:12PM +0100, Mike Hearn wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I'm pleased to announce the release of bitcoinj 0.11, a library for
> > writing Bitcoin applications that run on the JVM. BitcoinJ is widely us=
ed
> > across the Bitcoin community; some users include Bitcoin Wallet for
> > Android, MultiBit, Hive, blockchain.info, the biteasy.com block explorer
> > (written in Lisp!), Circle, Neo/Bee (Cypriot payment network), bitpos.m=
e,
> > Bitcoin Touch, BlueMatt's relay network and DNS crawler, academic advan=
ced
> > contracts research and more.
> > >
> > > The release-0.11 git tag is signed by Andreas Schildbach's GPG key. T=
he
> > commit hash is 410d4547a7dd. This paragraph is signed by the same Bitco=
in
> > key as with previous releases (check their release announcements to
> > establish continuity). Additionally, this email is signed using DKIM and
> > for the first time, a key that was ID verified by the Swiss government.
> > >
> > > Key: 16vSNFP5Acsa6RBbjEA7QYCCRDRGXRFH4m
> > > Signature for last paragraph:
> > H3DvWBqFHPxKW/cdYUdZ6OHjbq6ZtC5PHK4ebpeiE+FqTHyRLJ58BItbC0R2vo77h+DthpQ=
igdEZ0V8ivSM7VIg=3D
> >
> > The above makes for a great homework problem for budding cryptographers:
> > Why did the three forms of signature, DKIM, long-lived bitcoin address,
> > and Official Swiss Government Identity fail to let you actually verify
> > you have the right code? (but make for great security theater)
> >
> > Bonus question: Who has the smallest work-factor for such an attack?
> >
> > Two rewards of 25mBTC for correct responses to each question from a
> > crypto newbie.
> >
> > > Thanks to Mike Belshe, the wallet can now send to P2SH addresses.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > > Generated signatures now use canonical S values. This will aid a futu=
re
> > hard-forking rule change which bans malleable signatures.
> >
> > Soft-forking rule change.
> >
> > --
> > 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
> > 000000000000000075829f6169c79d7d5aaa20bfa8da6e9edb2393c4f8662ba0
> >

--=20
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
000000000000000075829f6169c79d7d5aaa20bfa8da6e9edb2393c4f8662ba0

--OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
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==
=dh+x
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY--