From: "Luke-Jr" <luke@dashjr.org>
To: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 15:26:14 +0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.7.3-gentoo; KDE/4.9.5; x86_64; ; )
References: <201303131256.30144.luke@dashjr.org> <20130313150501.GA14067@savin>
	<CAAS2fgT13KOu59O9u+ouQvo9BNUL-0EMeK1i2C980VpdQ41Pbw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAS2fgT13KOu59O9u+ouQvo9BNUL-0EMeK1i2C980VpdQ41Pbw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201303131526.16406.luke@dashjr.org>
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] 0.8.1 ideas
Precedence: list

On Wednesday, March 13, 2013 3:18:36 PM Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 8:05 AM, Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org> wrote:
> > If we're going to consider doing this, at minimum we need to also
> 
> I beg people to not derail discussion about fixing things with
> discussion of other controversial changes.

I figured 2 MB in 2-3 years was fairly uncontroversial.
If not, let's scrap that idea for now.

> Luke-jr, any chance in getting you to revise your proposal to narrow
> the scope to things that don't need serious debate?

It was a one-time "start the conversation" proposal.
I expect what we end up going with may be substantially different.

Luke