Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <tadas.varanavicius@gmail.com>) id 1RQorV-0007u8-4G
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Wed, 16 Nov 2011 23:25:49 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.161.47 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.161.47;
	envelope-from=tadas.varanavicius@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-fx0-f47.google.com; 
Received: from mail-fx0-f47.google.com ([209.85.161.47])
	by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1RQorU-0002bw-6e
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Wed, 16 Nov 2011 23:25:49 +0000
Received: by faat2 with SMTP id t2so3240384faa.34
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Wed, 16 Nov 2011 15:25:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.205.128.19 with SMTP id hc19mr31298918bkc.9.1321485941855;
	Wed, 16 Nov 2011 15:25:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.101] ([78.56.154.245])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z3sm185815faf.13.2011.11.16.15.25.39
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
	Wed, 16 Nov 2011 15:25:40 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4EC44673.4080101@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 01:25:39 +0200
From: Tadas Varanavicius <tadas.varanavicius@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US;
	rv:1.9.2.21) Gecko/20110831 Thunderbird/3.1.13
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
References: <CABsx9T2QUTzvC3cWOnc6Gc-EyCT-6hX4NO=-7yogzohRC+fn4w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABsx9T2QUTzvC3cWOnc6Gc-EyCT-6hX4NO=-7yogzohRC+fn4w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(tadas.varanavicius[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1RQorU-0002bw-6e
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Release candidates: versions 0.4.1 and 0.5
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 23:25:49 -0000

Hello,

newbie here, thanks for patience.

I start 0.5.0 without wallet.dat. It creates 100 new keys. I then 
encrypt them. It should be now bug free and totally secure, so I back 
the wallet up. I then click "new address", it doesn't use the old 2-100 
addresses, instead generates a new batch, because it assumes the old 
ones are leaked, but in fact they are not. I receive funds to my new 2nd 
address (which is now not backed up). I lose the new wallet. Restore 
from backup. Bitcoins lost forever?

Sorry if false alarm, thanks.

On 11/16/2011 06:34 PM, Gavin Andresen wrote:
> I need help sanity testing these:
>    https://sourceforge.net/projects/bitcoin/files/Bitcoin/bitcoin-0.4.1/test/
>    https://sourceforge.net/projects/bitcoin/files/Bitcoin/bitcoin-0.5.0/test/
>
-- 
Tadas Varanavičius
+37061529855