Return-Path: Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66E74C002B for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2023 18:36:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2493440C67 for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2023 18:36:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 2493440C67 Authentication-Results: smtp2.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 header.b=JlV5VUxA X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.848 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.848 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7b19lH71NnFu for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2023 18:36:38 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org A632540606 Received: from mail-ej1-x630.google.com (mail-ej1-x630.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::630]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A632540606 for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2023 18:36:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ej1-x630.google.com with SMTP id bk15so8568373ejb.9 for ; Thu, 02 Feb 2023 10:36:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=cBGwRlMcFQmS/zIBo3emMKWzttvw9a1gAvc8XvY5a5U=; b=JlV5VUxAuLfIR4hq2K0RgbCzPqQKnlovt5e4rL6f3igRKulaPjUuJ5UlRwUn/7quW7 dKMEYoQJ32wJ57FSxEGiedVJf8Q8fZmTf7DAM4ERL1PD1HcR3uDUcdkZVM5xkMP4LUTp KmCMJXPm6jTlVxh0PzMmtVKEJdjjiwmjK4OoZmP2r7lphl5r+pWfDskekZfp0razA8WD mQP39Tfnst9rofe1+QjF04PBT1YZQ1DRLhZSdN5Qs2NDckTzTNxiddaXwE9pvoy0iujT s4Bw5Hz9blAYM7fABI3wa1F06iVdm18uBBJMEhjPqvDDKb5kKx8I0C8XjRZgTqhxNNhD viaw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=cBGwRlMcFQmS/zIBo3emMKWzttvw9a1gAvc8XvY5a5U=; b=4DDqlE7h6PAa/37kzAHbbCLWAqvorL61pZfQVEmLitC/AhCfWnDNBQ9/VqbcKewDTn AOiknkFVHdWkqYfqxPY2y783GFZOMK7ZuyfNf8mrFBIsjcFcqSK3GaM4Szhcb3XyGbhd eYCnKTU3mZIg3FBP6bGYwxHdiyqKVbAZ7Rz3Y+/NkmhMxiPDdDX9VvLjO/rhYYN+LQZs SzDu98KrHCIllLVcPdoO9aAAiME0kaGIJRUPhuX2HKxlJji+lIX9KNdcUu5JdYIeTFeg oAUY5TRDQPis1UqXDxZd2LpFGArSY/PqR7Jd/ZfarKvm38SFoD9nrJ3NGTwLnu/nWV2d +RLw== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKUtiZfHBj9hvktDSWlX3kRUIYQIU3Jy9hYxisWZqf7gmA6PIsNW TWugtQuic6a0RGRLU22Q/E7Ua3GhWGeJakkUhIo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set8TPPCtfWTw5V2+4zQzpJHUAwHMp5Q+tW1C+NQ0yFFOoulCdrEjI3wkcxcvhFpiKCY3s+m3D+xe++OJgKHidsA= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:6851:b0:88a:2a05:5b47 with SMTP id a17-20020a170906685100b0088a2a055b47mr1871183ejs.294.1675362995586; Thu, 02 Feb 2023 10:36:35 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Greg Sanders Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2023 13:36:24 -0500 Message-ID: To: Peter Todd Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000038cd5605f3bbd8ca" Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ephemeral Anchors: Fixing V3 Package RBF againstpackage limit pinning X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2023 18:36:39 -0000 --00000000000038cd5605f3bbd8ca Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Quickly checked, it fails a number of standardness tests in unit/functional tests in Bitcoin Core, at least. OP_2 was actually Luke Jr's idea circa 2017 for about the same reasons, I just independently arrived at the same conclusion. On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 10:06 AM Peter Todd wrote: > On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 09:59:09AM -0500, Greg Sanders wrote: > > Hi Peter, > > > > For the most principled of reasons: > > > > Because I have to change test vectors everywhere! > > Specifically, you mean you'd have to change tests that test something is > non-standard? > > -- > https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org > --00000000000038cd5605f3bbd8ca Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Quickly checked, it fails a number of standardness tests i= n unit/functional tests in Bitcoin Core, at least.

OP_2 = was actually Luke Jr's idea circa 2017 for about the same reasons, I ju= st independently arrived at the same conclusion.

On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 = at 10:06 AM Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org> wrote:
On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 09:59:09AM -0500, Greg Sa= nders wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> For the most principled of reasons:
>
> Because I have to change test vectors everywhere!

Specifically, you mean you'd have to change tests that test something i= s
non-standard?

--
http= s://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
--00000000000038cd5605f3bbd8ca--