Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1WdIcE-0005MT-4B for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 12:18:58 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.213.179 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.213.179; envelope-from=laanwj@gmail.com; helo=mail-ig0-f179.google.com; Received: from mail-ig0-f179.google.com ([209.85.213.179]) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1WdIcD-0005cs-5P for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 12:18:58 +0000 Received: by mail-ig0-f179.google.com with SMTP id hl10so791141igb.12 for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 05:18:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.147.9 with SMTP id tg9mr9212099igb.31.1398341931815; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 05:18:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.22.168 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 05:18:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <53581D1D.1000709@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 14:18:51 +0200 Message-ID: From: Wladimir To: "Warren Togami Jr." Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (laanwj[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1WdIcD-0005cs-5P Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Development Roadmap of Bitcoin Core 0.9.2 X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 12:18:58 -0000 On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Wladimir wrote: > On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Warren Togami Jr. wrote: > > But indeed we need to decide on a cut-off point. I'd have preferred > 4.7 or 4.8. Qt 4.6 is *ancient* - it was released in februari 2010. > Apart from tails it doesn't seem like anyone is using those old stable > distributions on the desktop. Does anyone know of the timeframe in which tails will switch to a newer version of Qt? As it's debian based: will switch to a Wheezy/7.4. Wheezy has Qt 4.8 so is decidedly unproblematic. I see they're working on migration at least: - https://tails.boum.org/blueprint/Wheezy/ - https://git-tails.immerda.ch/tails/log/?h=feature/wheezy Wladimir