Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31DEAA7C for ; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 18:42:34 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from outmail149081.authsmtp.net (outmail149081.authsmtp.net [62.13.149.81]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69D28127 for ; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 18:42:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-c245.authsmtp.com (mail-c245.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.245]) by punt22.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id v84IgUSU051240; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 19:42:30 +0100 (BST) Received: from petertodd.org (ec2-52-5-185-120.compute-1.amazonaws.com [52.5.185.120]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id v84IgSAi044098 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 4 Sep 2017 19:42:29 +0100 (BST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by petertodd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C8D164029C; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 18:42:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 31C80224F4; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 10:10:17 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2017 10:10:17 -0400 From: Peter Todd To: Greg Sanders , Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Message-ID: <20170904141017.GG1276@fedora-23-dvm> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GLp9dJVi+aaipsRk" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Server-Quench: ce554d07-91a0-11e7-801f-9cb654bb2504 X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at: http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR aQdMdgYUC1AEAgsB AmEbWl1eVF97WmM7 bghPaBtcak9QXgdq T0pMXVMcUg1seEti d0ceVh1yfg0If3Zw YwgxC3VeWBB6clt0 Qx9UCGwHMGB9YGAe Bl1RJFFSdQcYLB1A alQxNiYHcQ5VPz4z GA41ejw8IwAXYg9S RxkXIEkJTEpBVj4x ThwPBy5nBlEfSiw2 RwAA X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1039:706 X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255) X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 52.5.185.120/25 X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own anti-virus system. X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_03_06, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] "Compressed" headers stream X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2017 18:42:34 -0000 --GLp9dJVi+aaipsRk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 12:26:48PM -0400, Greg Sanders via bitcoin-dev wrot= e: > Well, if anything my question may bolster your use-case. If there's a > heavier chain that is invalid, I kind of doubt it matters for timestamping > reasons. Timestamping can easily be *more* vulnerable to malicious miners than finan= cial applications for a number of reasons, including the fact that there's no financial feedback loop of miners destroying the value of the coins they produce - timestamping is a non-financial piggy-back application that doesn= 't directly interact with the Bitcoin economy, beyond a trival number of times= tamp transactions. --=20 https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org --GLp9dJVi+aaipsRk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJZrV7GAAoJECSBQD2l8JH7Zm0H/RWC+eDf2ODQcxtOzNgnU2cm J/q3LIDaRO1Ac2Fr5q4XoDvD718PHSw99M7qvJyVfakjvMyrrkwdhpmFSPto16oS 1M9MeXe9GmqANZ99tNz6hcMV/5te/Gr7UuMXdXJ5GHZ/yiFm0efePynnL9Abcm3I DpxWjr2iSDYrnBxHIUGCvwhaBXWfv0YlQGF5dxYpbi90IjnZJnbPSPdDMnRB0vzR YWtfJ4FNlyRIpOZMz9F1XoxJaLap5qhced/cptnpoiP4EmgEsjyNthEZyWY65Pqi P0zP8h6vL4A6yUMNDeSBQ9dFzypei0La4hYBcad+oohRodDWPBmCR8RgRtW6KcQ= =2nCn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GLp9dJVi+aaipsRk--