From: <eric@voskuil.org>
To: "'Anthony Towns'" <aj@erisian.com.au>
References: <03ca01d8d8fb$1558ed50$400ac7f0$@voskuil.org>
 <040f01d8d93c$a58c2540$f0a46fc0$@voskuil.org>
 <Yz/Hy39ablXUdmH+@erisian.com.au>
 <069201d8db50$59a98c60$0cfca520$@voskuil.org>
 <Y0JhqlNxUqVXQfpB@erisian.com.au>
 <008301d8dbac$c28280a0$478781e0$@voskuil.org>
 <Y0LMTtOYdNjzJ1MN@erisian.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <Y0LMTtOYdNjzJ1MN@erisian.com.au>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2022 15:05:38 -0700
Message-ID: <009a01d8dcf4$6e913290$4bb397b0$@voskuil.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-us
Thread-Index: AQGjJkZ87zZ0BUhtE3y1t2YHVdIMmQLud6c7AVI9RdsCSqBKvwK1YZmRAZbUfhwCMCW1Da4LXkmw
Cc: 'Bitcoin Protocol Discussion' <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Packaged Transaction Relay
Precedence: list

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au>
> Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Packaged Transaction Relay
> > > > > > Protocol cannot be defined on an ad-hoc basis as a "courtesy"
> > > > > BIPs are a courtesy in the first place.
> > > > I suppose if you felt that you were the authority then this would
> > > > be your perspective.
> > > You seem to think that I'm arguing courtesy is not a good thing, or
> > > that we couldn't use more of it?
> > That is neither what I said nor implied. You were clearly dismissing
> > the public process, not advocating for politeness.
> 
> And that is neither what I said nor implied, nor something I believe. If
you
> think courtesy is something that can be ignored in a public process, I
don't
> think you should expect much success.

"BIPs are a courtesy in the first place."

> If you'd like to actually participate in public standards development,
please
> feel free to make some technical comments on my proposals, or others, or
> make your own proposal, either here or on github, or heck, anywhere else.

"RE: [bitcoin-dev] Packaged Transaction Relay"

> I mean, that's what I'd suggest anyway; I'm not your boss. I promise to at
> least be entertainingly surprised if you make any progress with your
current
> approach though.

Grow up Anthony.

e