Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1XTQxA-0007TB-GE for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 07:44:04 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.3 as permitted sender) client-ip=80.91.229.3; envelope-from=gcbd-bitcoin-development@m.gmane.org; helo=plane.gmane.org; Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) id 1XTQx7-0007L6-W5 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 07:44:04 +0000 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XTQwy-0007do-8O for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 09:43:52 +0200 Received: from f052144115.adsl.alicedsl.de ([78.52.144.115]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 09:43:52 +0200 Received: from andreas by f052144115.adsl.alicedsl.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 09:43:52 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net From: Andreas Schildbach Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 09:43:32 +0200 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: f052144115.adsl.alicedsl.de User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.1 In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 1.1 DKIM_ADSP_ALL No valid author signature, domain signs all mail -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Headers-End: 1XTQx7-0007L6-W5 Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP72 amendment proposal X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 07:44:04 -0000 On 09/12/2014 08:43 PM, Aaron Voisine wrote: > Should BIP72 require that signed payment requests be from the same > domain, Although it currently does not seem to be used that way, I'd like to see merchants sign their payment requests but store them on their payment processors server. Currently if you buy from Humble Bundle, all you see is Coinbase which is unfortunate. > and also require https? I think that's unrealistic. HTTP is already in use, and also the proposed spec is open to other transports, e.g. Bluetooth which is also already in common use.