Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Z521n-0003qG-LC for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 01:20:31 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.213.179 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.213.179; envelope-from=gmaxwell@gmail.com; helo=mail-ig0-f179.google.com; Received: from mail-ig0-f179.google.com ([209.85.213.179]) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1Z521n-0008Bp-0k for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 01:20:31 +0000 Received: by igbos3 with SMTP id os3so57480596igb.0 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2015 18:20:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.7.68 with SMTP id h4mr7259748iga.40.1434504025788; Tue, 16 Jun 2015 18:20:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.107.147.213 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Jun 2015 18:20:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 01:20:25 +0000 Message-ID: From: Gregory Maxwell To: Mark Friedenbach Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (gmaxwell[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1Z521n-0008Bp-0k Cc: Bitcoin Development Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] [BIP draft] Consensus-enforced transaction replacement signalled via sequence numbers X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 01:20:31 -0000 On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 1:00 AM, Mark Friedenbach wrote: > Given that we have had more than two weeks of public discussion, code is > available and reviewed, and several community identified issues resolved, I > would like to formally request a BIP number be assigned for this work. Will > the BIP editor be so kind as to do so to allow the BIP consensus process to > proceed? BIP 68, unless you have objections.