Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <chris.double@gmail.com>) id 1UiZ3F-0005gQ-2s
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Fri, 31 May 2013 23:48:05 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.160.44 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.160.44; envelope-from=chris.double@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-pb0-f44.google.com; 
Received: from mail-pb0-f44.google.com ([209.85.160.44])
	by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1UiZ3D-0001oh-PH
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Fri, 31 May 2013 23:48:05 +0000
Received: by mail-pb0-f44.google.com with SMTP id wz12so2990671pbc.17
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Fri, 31 May 2013 16:47:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.66.145.229 with SMTP id sx5mr15771292pab.11.1370044077959;
	Fri, 31 May 2013 16:47:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: chris.double@gmail.com
Received: by 10.70.118.162 with HTTP; Fri, 31 May 2013 16:47:17 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CA+s+GJBo18mC84=09vEYZ0n7WVeA0MV2OfdvFDap0_sW7TinyA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAH2=CKzW41TYbX6c1F8oknA_LttOaA8vmDPmojuowXgEADY61g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALn1vHG5VbT4BeFW89DCAx0fzkjaGpABEMEZO42pAs-wdi-e5Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+s+GJBo18mC84=09vEYZ0n7WVeA0MV2OfdvFDap0_sW7TinyA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Chris Double <chris.double@double.co.nz>
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 11:47:17 +1200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: lKh5JKdxK0hqOBr4xVPT5VvE-c8
Message-ID: <CALn1vHGFWSbKDhm0_hkJOoZzMGicERJ9=1uHUqFhOyw8xMNqgA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(chris.double[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1UiZ3D-0001oh-PH
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Implementing batch processing for
	-blocknotify
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 23:48:05 -0000

On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Wladimir <laanwj@gmail.com> wrote:
> Using zmq is a great fit for high-speed notifications such as this. Have you
> seen the pull request to integrate zmq directly into bitcoind, so that you
> don't even need -blocknotify?
>
> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/2415
>
> If not: we could use some testing there!

I hadn't seen this, thanks! I've integrated zmq myself for block
notifications in bitcoin and the alt coins I use it on my bitparking
merge mining pool. I would love to see something official. I'll try
out the patch in the pull request.

Chris.
-- 
http://www.bluishcoder.co.nz