Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1QrZrp-0006CS-Oc for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 18:20:29 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from mail-yx0-f175.google.com ([209.85.213.175]) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1QrZro-0005AI-Ok for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 18:20:29 +0000 Received: by yxi19 with SMTP id 19so1914969yxi.34 for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 11:20:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.156.20 with SMTP id i20mr943330ybo.53.1313086823191; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 11:20:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.138.1 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 11:20:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 11:20:23 -0700 Message-ID: From: Rick Wesson To: Gavin Andresen Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00151750edb0a7d3b304aa3ed9af X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 1.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-Headers-End: 1QrZro-0005AI-Ok Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Roadmap/schedules X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 18:20:29 -0000 --00151750edb0a7d3b304aa3ed9af Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Gavin Andresen wrote: > I've been wading through the pull requests and bug lists to figure out > a roadmap for the next few months. > > Here are the things on my priority list: > > 1. Where are we at with network health? What metrics should we be > using? Is there work to be done? > And meta-issue: can somebody volunteer to be the Bitcoin Network > Health Inspector to keep track of this? > > I'm already on it, leveraging bitcoinj to do the work. I've added async capabilities to bitcoinj so that I can peer with everything that will let me with the goal of publishing quality peer lists via the DNS. Once I can build some metrics off the network its a matter of creating the visualizations. I just started on this project last week. Happy to work with others on what a healty network looks like as well as best ways to communicate status. also need advise on how to not be an impolite peer. -rick --00151750edb0a7d3b304aa3ed9af Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Gavin A= ndresen <ga= vinandresen@gmail.com> wrote:
I've been wading through the pull requests and bug lists to figure out<= br> a roadmap for the next few months.

Here are the things on my priority list:

1. Where are we at with network health? What metrics should we be
using? Is there work to be done?
And meta-issue: =A0can somebody volunteer to be the Bitcoin Network
Health Inspector to keep track of this?


I'm already on it, leveraging bitc= oinj to do the work. I've added async capabilities to bitcoinj so that = I can peer with everything that will let me with the goal of publishing qua= lity peer lists via the DNS. Once I can build some metrics off the network = its a matter of creating the visualizations.

I just started on this project last week. Happy to work= with others on what a healty network looks like as well as best ways to co= mmunicate status.

also need advise on how to not b= e an impolite peer.

-rick

--00151750edb0a7d3b304aa3ed9af--