Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <dtrammell@dustintrammell.com>) id 1WH15r-00087t-RF
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sat, 22 Feb 2014 01:09:27 +0000
X-ACL-Warn: 
Received: from mail-ob0-f169.google.com ([209.85.214.169])
	by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1WH15o-0005rG-JS
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sat, 22 Feb 2014 01:09:27 +0000
Received: by mail-ob0-f169.google.com with SMTP id wo20so5216735obc.0
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Fri, 21 Feb 2014 17:09:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to
	:references:content-type:mime-version;
	bh=ZwA5s32aAqJku2b1NwCLOx4uIFmg7iRPe6kLPQxXkZQ=;
	b=CDbn44eHC+76OCM9RpbY1/d81QtEn3iHHrUAu1Nvtd8Ys/6uokCLc1YUTnlyni/jK/
	WqPPSSV+uzfeeBQOiXC4ftZ7ViyCcQyXSn/Tkonz0j1usioGV8kDSblbzv50J5cE4CAD
	fFUfFh5eQ4aPgSLlBuO36ea9Cq9q1tuDkRjtCDEi4pr2lQcGHuifnZEN4zz+zwVr72Ge
	5WPbR5/0fPrzbXybRRmV44ufZigLmZu1CnoaU2sLBeoSOUwJULA3G7vrsdzPG3L8XxvN
	h1a5G9XPoZY0xQ72eUMB+w/gbRTjyaIwpowT9Qbh+IpDpcy4hlVSRLQhrUrLVClbYbJ/
	4SzA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnlYfhhEDENS0sjf/VJTUxviNonhyox2/GI4U/GH1gc3T4yFx/R39l1lIrnS/k/Z05Xb7X2
X-Received: by 10.182.22.33 with SMTP id a1mr8916905obf.60.1393031355985;
	Fri, 21 Feb 2014 17:09:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.3.3.33] ([24.153.183.182])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id bx1sm60445134oec.8.2014.02.21.17.09.14
	for <multiple recipients>
	(version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
	Fri, 21 Feb 2014 17:09:15 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <1393031340.6897.90.camel@staypuft>
From: "Dustin D. Trammell" <dtrammell@dustintrammell.com>
To: Wladimir <laanwj@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 19:09:00 -0600
In-Reply-To: <CA+s+GJAgs7otQB_tQNCntZ5gR+gp3+PfA+iiKPsjLu2oenaSUA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJHLa0OD7w0Rs5ygAE4C14EWm1=x57YHG2kOee1pzxvj3FQ38g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANEZrP2siw9hGPVsPjQ6WyohacOrs8rqs5p9ZsFY5kF0URnPWg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+s+GJCRqqmoHkmsq+6x9Wm6btKzdXoPjw5Af8zRDEkDE+6+zw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+s+GJAgs7otQB_tQNCntZ5gR+gp3+PfA+iiKPsjLu2oenaSUA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1";
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; 
	boundary="=-/NtRdv22jxLO+RSumayK"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Score: 0.4 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	0.4 NO_DNS_FOR_FROM DNS: Envelope sender has no MX or A DNS records
X-Headers-End: 1WH15o-0005rG-JS
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Fwd: Bitcoin Core trial balloon:
 splitting blockchain engine and wallet
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 01:09:28 -0000


--=-/NtRdv22jxLO+RSumayK
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, 2014-02-21 at 07:43 +0100, Wladimir wrote:
> The most straightforward way would be to run the blockchain daemon as
> a system service (with its own uid/gid and set of Apparmor/SELinux
> restrictions) and the wallet daemon as the user.

This assumes you as a user have the rights to do so.  This would be
preferred, but in some cases may not be possible.  Perhaps it should be
optional?

> This would also allow sharing one blockchain daemon between multiple
> users and wallet processes (not necessarily on the same machine),
> something I've wanted to be able to do for a long time.

Agreed (:

--=20
Dustin D. Trammell
dtrammell@dustintrammell.com
http://www.dustintrammell.com

--=-/NtRdv22jxLO+RSumayK
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAlMH+KwACgkQ9tleUv2mbhbUeQCfZ0s9qXk94GnxZEokEd96A3yQ
PGAAniAPMGq9b6ZkOoANFbaa8WYD9kAW
=FbIA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-/NtRdv22jxLO+RSumayK--